×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Gusset plate with large hole

Gusset plate with large hole

Gusset plate with large hole

(OP)
So, here's an odd question. Working on a design-build turbine and generator replacement project. Client needed to move some cross-bracing up slightly for clearance. Modified the bracing and columns for the adjusted working points. There was a fire suppression valve that went through the new brace location but I was assured that the valve could be rotated to miss. Turns out that was wrong, the valve can't be touched.

So, we're past the point of no return and the new braces have to go in. The plan is to construct an over-sized gusset plate out of two halves with a 10" diameter hole when the halves are CJP welded together. This will allow the valve stem to penetrate the gusset. All my bolting connections, work points, welds, and such remain the same as my originally designed gusset, it just now got very fat in the middle to keep the cross section equivalent to the original gusset without the hole. Brace is tension only.

Other than tension failure of the gusset at the hole and making sure I have enough distance between the ends of the gusset and the hole (Whitmore section) I can't think of anything else to check. There's gotta be something I'm missing, it seems like having a 10" hole in a gusset plate should be a much bigger deal.

Maine EIT, Civil/Structural.

RE: Gusset plate with large hole

it's relative. if your gusset is 24" then it makes sense that you could work around it. if your plate was only 14", then I'd be a lot more worried.

RE: Gusset plate with large hole

(OP)
Oh, good point. Yes, the gusset plate is large relative to the hole. Gusset plate was sized for 110 kip load and was 2'6" on the vertical dimension, 2'1" on the horizontal.

I've attached a picture showing the original and a rough sketch of the new gusset plate geometry.

Maine EIT, Civil/Structural.

RE: Gusset plate with large hole

Is the gusset plate at a beam-column connection or just at the column? I seem to remember a stress distribution lab from school where we pulled on a plate with a large hole from both sides to check the stress distribution around the hole. I can't recall the results off the top of my head, but I would double check the stress distribution in the plate. A quick internet search should give you some references. I wonder if the hole will affect how the load is distributed to the column and beam (if one is present). Does the uniform force method still apply? Will a moment develop at the connection? I feel like FEA modeling may be appropriate here.

RE: Gusset plate with large hole

D'oh, I posted as you were posting your sketch...

RE: Gusset plate with large hole

(OP)
In order of your questions Mike:

Column only. This is at the baseplate (see previous attached picture).

As best I can tell the uniform force method will apply for a case similar to special case 3 in the manual. The brace, column, and gusset to column weld should see the exact same forces as they did in my non-doughnut gusset plate.

A moment shouldn't develop at the connections as the centeroid of the weld and bolt group still pass through the working point axis of the brace. You did remind me that some small moment will develop in the middle of the gusset as the net cross-section is no longer aligned to the working axis of the brace but I imagine this will be negligible.

Yeah, I can quickly make this in a FEA program.

Maine EIT, Civil/Structural.

RE: Gusset plate with large hole

I guess if a beam were present, I would be worried about the stress distribution through the plate and how it distributes the forces to the beam and column and the applicability of the uniform force method. Since it's just attaching to the column, I can see how the forces would be the same. I guess it's really just a matter of stress distribution around the hole in the plate, unless someone else thinks of a potential problem.

Just out of curiosity, what program do you use for FEA?

RE: Gusset plate with large hole

(OP)
STAAD.Pro 2007. I know it's not a true FEA program and has a lot of limitations but for the work we do it's sufficient (but we do push it's boundaries sometimes).

Looking to get my boss to switch over to RISA-3D. Probably our biggest sticking point is RISA appears to be even less of a FEA program (que JoshPlum from RISA telling me it's the best).

Maine EIT, Civil/Structural.

RE: Gusset plate with large hole

I like STAAD.Pro; I used it frequently in my thesis research. We have had a few engineers do some interesting stuff in RISA. My firm has been debating getting a license of SAP2000 for situations like this, but we just can't seem to justify the cost when we already have the RISA suite, RAM suite, and ETABS/SAFE.

RE: Gusset plate with large hole

I don't love this but I can't think of anything better. Tension only and low seismic, right? Why is your work point up so high? Delivering lateral to slab on grade? I only ask because, if you could move the work point down, it would open up some more attractive options.

The greatest trick that bond stress ever pulled was convincing the world it didn't exist.

RE: Gusset plate with large hole

I would tend to make the gusset pl symmetrical(along centerline of load) @ the hole , at least....another area I would investigate... is there enough length in the gusset pl fore & aft of the hole to get a reasonable stress flow around the hole...if not, then the majority of the load may stay in the outer regions of the gusset pl and check if this is a problem or not.....there is a limit of relative hole size to width before this smooth stress flow around the hole begins to break down..unfortunately I don't know what that limit is without doing some research....

RE: Gusset plate with large hole

Considering the geometry, I wonder if you could borrow some of the design procedures used for eye bars.

The greatest trick that bond stress ever pulled was convincing the world it didn't exist.

RE: Gusset plate with large hole

(OP)
KootK: Tension only and low seismic. Don't love it either and fully expect any engineer who sees this gusset to go "what the hell?" We're modifying the existing work point up to make room under the cross bracing for a means of egress doorway and material passage for the replacement turbine and generator. Yes, my lateral loads are transferred to a slab on grade. My brace forces don't increase much from the geometry. Mostly all I've done is add a large weak-axis moment to the building columns from the work point moving. Thankfully these are heavy industrial columns and required only minimal reinforcement for the changed load path. I could raise my workpoint even more but that would require reinforcement of my already reinforced columns.

SAIL3: There is enough length for the typical 30 degree Whitmore section stress flow. I would imagine a 10" diameter hole in a 3 foot wide plate would be relatively small of a stress riser but you are correct. We did add a little fat because of this.

Maine EIT, Civil/Structural.

RE: Gusset plate with large hole

(OP)
Oh! Good call KootK! Star for you.

Maine EIT, Civil/Structural.

RE: Gusset plate with large hole

(OP)
Looking over the section some of the limitations are exceeded but I can probably make some assumptions, as these rules are written to transfer loads to a pin in bearing, that I can make some reasonable adjustments.

Maine EIT, Civil/Structural.

RE: Gusset plate with large hole

Are the braces four angles cruciform? Is it to late I change that?

The greatest trick that bond stress ever pulled was convincing the world it didn't exist.

RE: Gusset plate with large hole

(OP)
Single WT 6x15, originally was A36, we upgraded it to A992 and kept the same size for the slightly larger brace force from the new work point.

Maine EIT, Civil/Structural.

RE: Gusset plate with large hole

The side plates might be better off as WT for stiffness and nominal compression capacity. Keep an eye on shear lag. Should be adaptable to WT bracing.

The greatest trick that bond stress ever pulled was convincing the world it didn't exist.

RE: Gusset plate with large hole

(OP)
Interesting idea. I could probably carve out part of the web of a W24 beam or something and make a shape that would be pretty much what your sketch showed and should mate up easily to my tee and fit around the pipe with the flanges of the beam in place of the fitting plates. It would also have the advantage of being 50 ksi steel as opposed to 36 ksi.

In this job speed is worth more than money by a large amount. For example when we told the client would be expensive to do the bracing modification it was almost like they handed us a blank check and said "do what you need to do, just make it happen."

For a little background, this turbine/generator will allow the client to run 100% off grid and they need it in by January 1st. All was well until the condenser they purchased became unavailable and everyone had to do last minute redesigns to make a new condenser work in addition to all the work still remaining on the turbine and generator.

Maine EIT, Civil/Structural.

RE: Gusset plate with large hole

Koot's concept is a good alternative if not a bit busy.....another option may be to flip the gusset pl 90 degrees and lign it up with the base pl work-point as it looks like it would clear the valve....I would be concerned with the 1'-5" off the base pl...if this is causing a moment in the col then I would expect a portion of that moment to find it's way into the base pl/anchor bolt area and cause a potential problem there...there is also the option of using a tension brace other than the WT that might faciltate a more reasonable gusset pl connection....

RE: Gusset plate with large hole

(OP)
I couldn't get enough weld flipping the plate 90 degrees but something like that might work. As for the baseplate, interestingly enough the original building designers did not use centered work points as would be expected, they actually used work points at the intersections of flanges and columns. The column base plates were 3 inches thick and well anchored. I ran some rough calculations so that I'm satisfied that they can take some moment. The column itself was designed assuming a pinned base so structurally as long as we don't destroy the anchor bolts there shouldn't be an issue that I see with the moment imparted to column.

Maine EIT, Civil/Structural.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources