INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Jobs

Reverse Polarity Protection

Reverse Polarity Protection

(OP)
Guys,
Can you comment on the downside of the attached circuit comparing to other methods of reverse polarity protection? I do not want to use bridge or diode for power dissipation reasons ( parallel reverse bias diode will blow the fuse so that is also not an option). This circuit will see occasional +/-250V,70us pulse during its operation. The nominal input voltage is 16V-36V. My major concern is if the MOSFET will survive when input is hit by -250V. The filter module shown with part number at output side is from Vicor.
Thx

RE: Reverse Polarity Protection

Why are you putting transient protection on a module that actually is a trasient protection module?

I don't have time right now to confirm, but I think that there might even be reverse polarity protection in the Vicor products as well. Many of the mil standards quoted include all sorts of tests. I have distant recollection everything was built in. The purpose of the Vicor product line is to eliminate virtually all of the discrete components. Dirty military vehicle power on one side, clean system power on the other.

Have you made contact with their application engineers? If you haven't, then you should. Such contacts can eliminate nearly 100% of design risk. Typically no charge, very friendly.




RE: Reverse Polarity Protection

The FIAM does not include polarity reversal, as shown in in Figure 5 of the datasheet: http://www.vicorpower.com/documents/datasheets/ds_...

Why don't you just get a transistor that can handle the voltage? Or use something else to clip the spikes?

TTFN
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

Need help writing a question or understanding a reply? forum1529: Translation Assistance for Engineers

Of course I can. I can do anything. I can do absolutely anything. I'm an expert!

RE: Reverse Polarity Protection

(OP)
Transient protection is Vicor's recommendation. The bridge is what they are recommending for reverse polarity protection. But the voltage loss/power loss in the bridge is not desirable. The MOSFET needed for this job needs to handle only 100V and this fit the budget from all the specs needed. Not sure about the -100V that will hit it after the TVS with FIAM9 in series.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close