×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Rafter to Pole Plate Concealed Connection

Rafter to Pole Plate Concealed Connection

Rafter to Pole Plate Concealed Connection

(OP)
I have a small project at the moment where the client wants to install a leanto off the front of an existing dwelling. The site is located in Australia with a very dry, hot climate and low wind loads.

The client does not want to use metal hangers to make connections between timber elements as they will be left exposed. I could not find a suitable connection in the residential framing code AS1684.2 so designed the connection for shear, bending & bearing taking the reduced section properties into consideration. I am not sure what effect notching the hardwood will have in such environment though and am concerned about potential splitting. Can you please share your thoughts on the attached detail?

I guess the other (safer?) option would be to use something like this:
http://www.dhcsupplies.com/store/p/3739-CJT6S-Conc...


Kind regards,
Jake

RE: Rafter to Pole Plate Concealed Connection

jrbaus: A sketch of the proposed framing would help? Is it cantilevered construction, post-and beam framing, approx plan size etc?

Just so we can get a 'feel' for the magnitude of actions.

RE: Rafter to Pole Plate Concealed Connection

Yeah, it will probably split where you show the red line. Tell you client of that potential problem. If there is no load then may be there will be no splitting. I have seen the type of problem several times with no occurences, probably because the superimposed loads were light.

RE: Rafter to Pole Plate Concealed Connection

(OP)
Hi chicopee,

Thanks for your input and confirming my suspicions. There is indeed little long term load on the connection since it is only supporting the dead load of the roof however any splitting is obviously going to be just as aesthetically displeasing (if not worse) than joist hangers in my opinion.

Regards Jake

RE: Rafter to Pole Plate Concealed Connection

Could you use the joist hangers then add an additional 'decorative' notched ledger/plate to conceal them?

Or bear the joist directly on a smaller ledger/plate below the joist and infill with blocking between the joists?

Or use a deeper ledger/plate and fully notch it for the joists to insert? Have to make sure all your attachment to the wall is below the joist and that the reduced section can x-fer load.

Just some ideas...

RE: Rafter to Pole Plate Concealed Connection

You could reinforce the notch with a vertical wood screw through the bottom.

The greatest trick that bond stress ever pulled was convincing the world it didn't exist.

RE: Rafter to Pole Plate Concealed Connection

@jrbaus: It is not clear to me from your 'perspective view' sketch, but is this 'leanto' cantilevering?

RE: Rafter to Pole Plate Concealed Connection

(OP)
@azcats: thank you for the suggestions. I am limited to having the pole plate at about 140mm deep. 'The decorative' option might be a better way to go.
@KootK: interesting suggestions - I will examine that option further
@Ingenuity: leanto rafters are simply supported, not cantilevered. Pole plate one end, veranda beam the other end.

RE: Rafter to Pole Plate Concealed Connection

Wow - KootK - we must think alike. I was going to suggest the same idea as I used it once on a set of exterior glue-lam beams which were hit by a rental van trying to drive under a canopy which was too low.

What we did was drill lead holes vertically from the bottom of the beam up past the theoretical horizontal crack line (in our case the cracks were already there).
We then drilled larger diameter countersink holes for the lag screw heads and washers.
Then we installed lag screws up into the lead holes and used long enough screws to "develop" past the crack and draw the crack together.
Then a wood plug in the bottom to close it up and leave a "wood" beam.

Check out Eng-Tips Forum's Policies here:
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: Rafter to Pole Plate Concealed Connection

This may be a low wind region theoretically, but the most common method of failure of this type roof in Australia is by being blown away in a thunderstorm. Thunderstorms can occur anywhere. I would want a better connection for uplift.

RE: Rafter to Pole Plate Concealed Connection

What type of wall is it? In new construction I have ran the beam into the wall and bolted/lag screwed them to studs each side. If you cannot do this, I would perfer to use the "decorative option" that azcats mentioned.

Garth Dreger PE - AZ Phoenix area
As EOR's we should take the responsibility to design our structures to support the components we allow in our design per that industry standards.

RE: Rafter to Pole Plate Concealed Connection

@JAE: like your scenario, I've only ever done this in response to a horizontal shear crack. If the member were reinforced pre-emptively, you'd still get the crack, right? I'm thinking of this similarly to concrete reinforcement: marginally active until after cracking.

The greatest trick that bond stress ever pulled was convincing the world it didn't exist.

RE: Rafter to Pole Plate Concealed Connection

Simpson makes a concealed hanger

http://www.homedepot.com/p/Simpson-Strong-Tie-12-G...




When I am working on a problem, I never think about beauty but when I have finished, if the solution is not beautiful, I know it is wrong.

-R. Buckminster Fuller

RE: Rafter to Pole Plate Concealed Connection

This connector is only "concealed" for 4X rafters and joists though. You will see it for 2X to either side of the joist.

Mike McCann, PE, SE (WA)


RE: Rafter to Pole Plate Concealed Connection

Mike - I don't know about your assertion. My three gluelam beams using the vertical lag screws have performed very well for perhaps 7 years.

Check out Eng-Tips Forum's Policies here:
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: Rafter to Pole Plate Concealed Connection

JAE...

Glue lam beams are one thing and less susceptible to splitting than a solid stick. However, they can and do split. These are 35 mm joists - less than 1.5 inches wide. These are far more susceptible to splitting than a glue lam that does not come less than 3.125" wide.

Perhaps I am missing something here? I will have to check the AITC tomorrow, but I d not think this would be a good fix for a split 2x joist.

Mike McCann, PE, SE (WA)


RE: Rafter to Pole Plate Concealed Connection

(OP)
@hokie66: I tend to agree with you. A stronger tie down is cheap insurance.
@woodmain88: It is an existing hardwood stud wall with weatherboard on the outside.
@manstrom: thanks for taking the time to put a sketch together. Most appreciated. I might run this option by the client and see if he still wants to pursue the ‘concealed’ arrangement.
@msquared48: thanks for the link to the Simpson hanger with pricing. I am waiting for confirmation of availability in Australia from the manufacturer.

Thanks all for your comments. It is reassuring to get advice on some of these issues that are outside my area of normal practice (have mainly worked with steel up to this point).

Regards Jake

RE: Rafter to Pole Plate Concealed Connection

Sorry - I missed the 35 mm part.
Perhaps you are right - but with a pre-drilled hole there would be less outward pressure upon installation of the screw - using many small diameter screws still seems feasible.
You can get 1/4" diameter x 12 inch long lags.

Check out Eng-Tips Forum's Policies here:
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: Rafter to Pole Plate Concealed Connection

I agree it would help, but I still would not do it. The OP was asking how to mitigate splitting, and I would start by providing a detail where that will not occur. I feel that that is what I drew up. No worries.

Mike McCann, PE, SE (WA)


Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources