×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Grout Strength with 2xw2 cubes

Grout Strength with 2xw2 cubes

Grout Strength with 2xw2 cubes

(OP)
We recently were required to cast 2x2 cubes to test grout for two different types of piles. On both projects with different contractors and grout suppliers, we had very inconsistent strengths. We were required to evaluate strength by 3 cubes at 7 and 28 days. Many times the strength did not increase much between the 7 and 28 day tests. We looked at all the usual suspected sources of error and could not come up with anything on our end. The grout on one job was a pre-mix product that should be very consistent. On the other job this was the first time the plant made the design mix. On that job we made companion 3x6 cylinders that always did much better than the cubes. Has anyone had similar issues?

RE: Grout Strength with 2xw2 cubes

Who prepared the cubes?? Had they previuos experience in preparing test cubes or were just labourers assigned a task with no training? How much water did they use?? What were the conditions where the cubes were stored prior to testing?? Unless you have answers to all these points you are completely in the dark.

RE: Grout Strength with 2xw2 cubes

Yes. Have had similar results multiple times. I'm not a fan of cubes being used in the field. In most cases, the mass of the cube mold is much greater than the mass of the sample, so easier to disturb the sample. If the grout has ANY coarse aggregate in it, the stress distribution in a cube (which was originally intended for lab use to check cement and mortar strengths, using fine aggregate in a specific gradation)...will be thrown off.

Cylinders are more indicative of the strength and easier to control with consistency. There are many who will disagree with me, but those are my observations for a lot of testing over the last 30+ years.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources