×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Remove 1-part of 3-part pressure vessel - Any special considered needed?

Remove 1-part of 3-part pressure vessel - Any special considered needed?

Remove 1-part of 3-part pressure vessel - Any special considered needed?

(OP)
So we have a 'distillation column' that is made up of 3 parts (top, middle, and bottom). The three parts are connected by flanges. All parts are manufactured to ASME VIII and share the same National Board number.

We want to run a test where we remove the bottom part and blank off the end of the middle part so we only have a top and middle.

My question is what additional work / testing would have to be done for the modification? Since all three pieces are under the same NB# and are all ASME vessels, can we do the modification and then do a pressure test (not a true hydrostatic pressure test but just enough to make sure that the flange is holding) and be okay or do we need to get a certified inspector in and have updates made to the NB records? Since it's all flanged and no welding/cutting/grinding type of work is needed, I didn't think much needed to be done, but we want to be careful.

RE: Remove 1-part of 3-part pressure vessel - Any special considered needed?

If the connection between the parts is by flanges, and the flanges are standard ASME B16.5 or B16.47, then you have to do nothing. That assumes you've followed all applicable codes for the piping changes, HAZOPed the revised equipment to make sure it is properly relieved etc.

If the flanges are not B16 type but are designed flanges, the new "cover flange" becomes a subcomponent of the "new" vessel. I'm not sure how it would be registered, or tested...

RE: Remove 1-part of 3-part pressure vessel - Any special considered needed?

Same NB no. is one vessel and any modification legally needs to be done by an R stamp holder and follow inspection procedures. Mechanically assembled units without modifications can be assembled and disassembled by anyone without inspection.
Notice that) n most US states the Jurisdiction has to authorize the repairs or alterations of any boiler and p.v.

RE: Remove 1-part of 3-part pressure vessel - Any special considered needed?

(OP)
So I looked at the flange and it was a designed flange (no ASME/ANSI stamps on it). So if I'm to remove part of the vessel and put a blank on it, that work needs to be done by someone with an R stamp and then have to figure out what the inspection procedures are?

RE: Remove 1-part of 3-part pressure vessel - Any special considered needed?

". . . put a blank on it, that work needs to be done by someone with an R stamp . . " Yes. And the holder of the R-stamp will perform the necessary inspections and testing. It may end up being an R-2 Alteration and require a rehydro. Usinga stamp-holder gives you "one stop shopping"; they are required to perform all the necessary work, including PWHT, NDE, etc. Only thing left for the owner is touching up the paint.

RE: Remove 1-part of 3-part pressure vessel - Any special considered needed?

You will certainly need some design work done on the "blank". Depending on the diameter of your vessel, a flat plate may require too much thickness and may not be available. The "blank" might then become a flanged and dished head that is essentially a code piece.

RE: Remove 1-part of 3-part pressure vessel - Any special considered needed?

It can be done under R stamp using NBIC
It shall be considered as Alteration as the overall length is changed that may affect the loading conditions. Refer 3.4.3(d)
Additional blank must be designed unless standard flange with suitable pressure temperature rating is used.
If the name plate was attached to the bottom part, it shall have to be transferred to another location
Discuss with your AI in details before proceeding.
Original vessel should have suitable markings on each part as required by UG-116(k)

RE: Remove 1-part of 3-part pressure vessel - Any special considered needed?

(OP)
Thanks for all the input. I was afraid that it was going to be more work than simply installing a blank flange.

RE: Remove 1-part of 3-part pressure vessel - Any special considered needed?

(OP)
What about just putting in a slip blank between the flanges? Would that still need the additional resources?

RE: Remove 1-part of 3-part pressure vessel - Any special considered needed?

mp08
Why don't you tell us how big the whole vessel is and how big the individual parts are. What is the pressure rating of the three part vessel. Many people work on very large equipment where it would not be uncommon to invest thousands to get this done. Tell us what you have. What you are doing, and why you are doing it. What you hope to achieve. We might be able to help you a lot more.

Regards
StoneCold

RE: Remove 1-part of 3-part pressure vessel - Any special considered needed?

(OP)
The vessel acts like a distillation column off a reactor for glycol and water. It was designed so that the water evaporates and the glycol goes back to the reactor. We want to get rid of the bottom part (which is setup like a vertical heat exchanger) since the glycol just seems to settle down there and even if we are to empty it, we can't reuse it due to possible contamination. The exit piping to the reactor is above this bottom piece. We can't just repipe since the bottom of the vessel is lower than the reactor nozzle. We try to recover as much glycol as possible for cost savings. If we get rid of this part, more glycol can be returned to the reactor.

The entire vessel is 32in ID (which is why I'm thinking a slip blank may difficult) and about 42ft tall. The bottom section we want to take off is about 8.5ft long. The whole system is rated for 43.5 psig.

I hope this helps.

RE: Remove 1-part of 3-part pressure vessel - Any special considered needed?

I can almost guarantee you that it will be cheaper to have a short dished head with flange constructed than to try to do this with a blind. Either way the new component will need its own U stamp, which begs the question of how to minimize the cost of testing it. It's unlikely that the shop is going to have a 32" blind just laying around.

RE: Remove 1-part of 3-part pressure vessel - Any special considered needed?

mp08
Indulge me for a moment. At my facility we had a column that was completely below the reactor that fed it. The vapor came off the top of the reactor and ran down the side of the column and entered just below the packing. Liquid was pumped from the bottom of the column back to the reactor. Due to the size we used a positive displacement pump that we adjusted the stroke on to keep the liquid pumped out.
You could do this many other ways, but instead of modifying the column you could just return the liquid to the reactor with a pump around loop.

Regards

StoneCold

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources