×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Design of Concrete Sleepers

Design of Concrete Sleepers

Design of Concrete Sleepers

(OP)
Hi,

I'm designing a concrete sleeper which will support a 78" dia pipe and several smaller pipes (2" to 6" dia). The sleeper looks like a wall footing with length equal to 21' and height of 8'-8". Its (wall-like) pedestal is 18" thick.

The 78" dia pipe has high anchor loads (lateral loads normal to pedestal) but the pipe shoe which transfer the lateral loads from pipe to pedestal is only 8". For shear and flexure design of pedestal, what effective width should I use? I'm doubtful to consider the whole pedestal length to provide shear and flexural resistance. Am I correct?

Your responses will be highly appreciated. Thanks!

RE: Design of Concrete Sleepers

I think that you're correct. I would:

1) Use ACI Appendix D for the anchorage design.
2) For flexure, assume a 30-45 degree load spread to the base.
3) Shear is the tricky bit. First, I'd figure out how close to the top I could get with one way shear working over the load spread area mentioned above. Then I'd check lateral, slab edge style punching shear on the section of wall above.

A sketch would help. I'm not entirely sure that I understand the situation.

The greatest trick that bond stress ever pulled was convincing the world it didn't exist.

RE: Design of Concrete Sleepers

(OP)
Thanks for your response KootK.

I think you're on the right track. I'll attach a sketch for clarity.
I have assumed a width 3 times the wall thickness which will make my design over-conservative considering your assumption of 30-45 degree load spread to the base is correct. Can you support that assumption with a reference? I want have a clear picture of the principles involved in order to design such structures more economical.

RE: Design of Concrete Sleepers

Nice. Just as I imagined it. I don't have a specific reference I'm afraid. For simple spans, there is related guidance in:

1) PCI handbook
2) UK concrete code
3) SDI composite deck manual.

For strength purposes, you can always design in a distribution beam at the top of your wall and then distribute your loads laterally as far as the capacity of that beam will allow. In your case, you can probably have the width of the whole wall for the sake of a few 20M at the top.

The greatest trick that bond stress ever pulled was convincing the world it didn't exist.

RE: Design of Concrete Sleepers

I'd recommend turning your wall vertical hooks inwards. Think retaining wall. Field guys may balk but life will go on.

The greatest trick that bond stress ever pulled was convincing the world it didn't exist.

RE: Design of Concrete Sleepers

Looking at this from the pipe perspective, just make sure you've got the loads correct from the pipe. This looks like it should be a simple sliding support not an "anchor", but maybe that was misinterpretation from me and you mean anchor of the plate into the support?. There will be some significant loads from weight and friction for such a large pipe and T supports are notorious for either falling over or breaking when construction doesn't match the nice drawing.... If this was an anchor then both support and concrete support would need to be much much bigger.

You could always make the support plate fixing into the concrete better and bigger?

My motto: Learn something new every day

Also: There's usually a good reason why everyone does it that way

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources