×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

NX 9 Performance

NX 9 Performance

NX 9 Performance

(OP)

We've been running NX 9 for about a month with about 100 users. The guys working with large assemblies are complaining about how everything is running slowly.

Also, users who make parts with patterned holes report updates are painfully slow. Sitting and watching each instance of a pattern update at about 2 seconds per hole.

Seems like something is really wrong. We've tried a few Customer Default setting changes, but it isn't helping.

Thoughts?

RE: NX 9 Performance

To start with, make sure that all of the Pattern Features have their 'Feature Method' set to 'Simple' (if you can't change it to 'Simple', NX will tell you that so it's safe to change all of them that you can).

John R. Baker, P.E.
Product 'Evangelist'
Product Engineering Software
Siemens PLM Software Inc.
Digital Factory
Cypress, CA
Siemens PLM:
UG/NX Museum:

To an Engineer, the glass is twice as big as it needs to be.

RE: NX 9 Performance

(OP)
Thanks John.

While that seems like a good solution (going to SIMPLE) these patters are for threaded holes. Whether we make them "Threaded Holes" at the start, or "General Holes" with Threads added (and feature grouped), SIMPLE is not allowed, and we are stuck with the crazy-long update times.

Is there something else we can try?

RE: NX 9 Performance

Are you using symbolic or detailed threads?


www.jcb.com
NX 8.5 with TC 8.3

RE: NX 9 Performance

(OP)
They are Symbolic Threads.

Pattern forces you into "Variational" whenever you add threads - which seems to really slow everything down.

RE: NX 9 Performance

Use a "threaded hole" in the new hole command, which creates only one feature for your hole.

You can then use a simple pattern (which only allows for selection of one feature).

www.jcb.com
NX 8.5 with TC 8.3

RE: NX 9 Performance

(OP)

That gives me a failure Report:

Update Warning and Failure Report

************************************************************

------------------------------------------------------------
PATTERNS
------------------------------------------------------------
Pattern Feature [Linear] (8) / Instance[5][1] Error: Parent features failed to update

RE: NX 9 Performance

Could you attach a pic including part nav and pattern dialogue?

www.jcb.com
NX 8.5 with TC 8.3

RE: NX 9 Performance

(OP)

Sorry - The last Failure report was user error (me, ha!).
Ignore that message.

The problem we are having is that we have Counter-Bored, Threaded Holes. The multiple nature of this hole forces into "Variational" and is killing our performance.

RE: NX 9 Performance

OK,

To avoid using variational in this case:

1. Create the counter-bore part of the hole only (could even just extrude a circle)
2. Pattern that (simple pattern)
3. Create a threaded hole through the centre of the c-bore
4. Pattern that, using simple and pattern type "reference", by selecting the original pattern




www.jcb.com
NX 8.5 with TC 8.3

RE: NX 9 Performance

(OP)

...we'll give that a try. Thanks!

RE: NX 9 Performance

No probs, I just tested and you could even use Pattern Face on the synchronous toolbar for the first pattern (the counterbore).

Pattern face is a light-weight pattern as all instances are identical.

It's defined slightly differently (in NX8.5), but you can use it as your "reference" for the following feature pattern.

Attached pic.

www.jcb.com
NX 8.5 with TC 8.3

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources