×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Rebar sizes for middle bars in deep beams - the theory

Rebar sizes for middle bars in deep beams - the theory

Rebar sizes for middle bars in deep beams - the theory

(OP)
In deep beams there is a code requirement to have no bar further than 300mm from a restrained bar. As far as I know, this is a crack prevention thing. So, for example, on a 600mm deep beam, you will need one middle bar.
From the detailing code, I gather that the bar diameter is determined by the beam width. But if the purpose of the bar is to prevent cracks, why does the bar increase in size with the diameter? It is assumed to not be working, so what effect does the width have? Or is it more of a practical consideration?

As a note, I work in South Africa using the SANS codes (South African National Standards). Most concrete is based on British codes of practice, but the theory should be universal.

RE: Rebar sizes for middle bars in deep beams - the theory

Crack control reinforcement does not prevent cracks, it controls them. When a crack forms, the bar controls the width of the crack by providing a tensile, or clamping, force. Therefore the bar is "working".

RE: Rebar sizes for middle bars in deep beams - the theory

(OP)
Let me try clarify:
The steel is 'working' in the sense that it stops crack propagation. However, it is assumed to not be working in the sense that it is assumed it is not working against bending in the beam.

So the question is why would you need a thicker bar for a 500mm (+/- 20") wide beam, as opposed to a 250mm (+/- 10") wide beam with a smaller diameter bar to prevent cracking? Or is there another reason for it?

I don't like giving the answer "because the code says so", and my knowledge in concrete cracking is not able to explain this. Yet.

RE: Rebar sizes for middle bars in deep beams - the theory

You have a good point, if that is what your code says. As I am not familiar with the SANS codes, I can't say, but apparently the theory is not universal.

ACI318 and the Australian Standard AS3600 treat this reinforcement as "skin" or "side face" reinforcement, and I think the amount required is independent of the beam width. The ACI code only requires these bars in the tension half depth of beams, and states that the size of the bars is not so important. In practice, I think most engineers would provide the bars over the full height rather than switching back and forth.

RE: Rebar sizes for middle bars in deep beams - the theory

(OP)
Thanks Hokie, that reference to the other codes definitely helps. I was looking this up as skin reinforcing and size does not seem to be a governing factor in design. Perhaps then it's a detailing question for more practical consideration rather than design.
Much appreciated.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources