×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Braced frames - connection type for analysis purposes

Braced frames - connection type for analysis purposes

Braced frames - connection type for analysis purposes

(OP)
Hello guys!

I'd like to find out your opinion about modelling issues of braced frames. As horizontal members of braced frames (girders) are subject to high axial loads, should it be a moment connection between horizontal member and column or not really? I mean, theoritically if we design braced frame we don't need moment connections in it, but when there are huge axial forces in bracing members, how to transfer them onto columns without moment connection? Summarizing: what is a better approach in modelling braced frames- treat all members as axial members only (diagonals and girders) and design connections accordingly or take advantage of massive axial connection due to large axial force and do it as moment connection--> bending moments in horizontal member even out?
Please see the attachement.

RE: Braced frames - connection type for analysis purposes

Is your connection in a high seismic application? Is your brace concentric or eccentric? US?

Normally, I would pin the far ends of the beams. Axial transfer capacity alone usually doesn't necessitate fixed connections. That being said, your modelling should reflect the real world detailing. The connection in the photo certainly looks fixed to me.

In an eccentric, seismic application, fixity provides a redundant lateral mechanism (moment frame). If I remember correctly, I think that US codes reward that in the force reduction factor.

The greatest trick that bond stress ever pulled was convincing the world it didn't exist.

RE: Braced frames - connection type for analysis purposes

(OP)
Low seismic risk, CBF's. In the US application I've seen mainly fixed connections but it's probably due to seismic provisions I think. But on the other side, if assign pin condition for beams how to transfer an axial force of around 1000 kips? Maybe sth like in the attached pic?

RE: Braced frames - connection type for analysis purposes

I'd investigate the connection a bit and let that be your guide. If you end up having to attach the entire section for axial transfer then sure, call it fixed.

The greatest trick that bond stress ever pulled was convincing the world it didn't exist.

RE: Braced frames - connection type for analysis purposes

It looks as though the load that would cause the moment is horizontal. If so, therte will be points of contraflexure in from each end. By modelling the joints as pinned, you force points of contraflexure at those pins. See where they would occur in the fixed model and see if it is very different.

Michael.
"Science adjusts its views based on what's observed. Faith is the denial of observation so that belief can be preserved." ~ Tim Minchin

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources