×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
• Talk With Other Members
• Be Notified Of Responses
• Keyword Search
Favorite Forums
• Automated Signatures
• Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Naca 6-series nomenclature

Naca 6-series nomenclature

(OP)
Hello,

I'm trying to draw in CAD a NACA airfoil, but I'm having problems with the nomenclature. The information I have is:

NACA 65(xx)(yy) (e.g. NACA 65(07)07)

With xx standing for the relative camber and YY representing the relative thickness (that's what the information about the airfoil says)

The problem is that this nomenclature doesn't match any of the "official" nomenclature, though I think it's obviously and airfoil of the 65 series. The official 6-series nomenclature would be:

The number "6" indicating the series.
One digit describing the distance of the minimum pressure area in tens of percent of chord.
The subscript digit gives the range of lift coefficient in tenths above and below the design lift coefficient in which favorable pressure
A hyphen.
One digit describing the design lift coefficient in tenths.
Two digits describing the maximum thickness as percent of chord.

Thank you for the help.

RE: Naca 6-series nomenclature

(OP)

It's useless since I don't know the correct nomenclature for the airfoil.

RE: Naca 6-series nomenclature

(OP)
Well, I've found several reports that use that nomenclature. For example:

http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/56/52/34/P...

(To search quickly, control+f and search for "xx")

As it says on the reference:

Profile designation according to the nomenclature given in Noguera, R., Rey, R., Massouh, F., Bakir, F. &
Kouidri, S. (1993). “Design and analysis of axial pumps”. In ASME Fluids Engineering, Second Pumping Machinery Symposium, Washington, USA., pp. 95–111.

Unfortunately, I can't find anywhere that reference. However, i'm still wondering why they use such nomenclature and they don't use the official one (¿?).

RE: Naca 6-series nomenclature

I think the problem is that without the coordinates that match the profile name you have, you can't reproduce the airfoil.

The paper was from 1993, certainly pre-dating widespread electronic publication. I wonder if they really used an NACA designation, which would be assigned by NACA or just made up their own.

If the authors are still working you might be able to contact them.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

• Talk To Other Members
• Notification Of Responses To Questions
• Favorite Forums One Click Access
• Keyword Search Of All Posts, And More...

Register now while it's still free!