×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Modelling or not the covers in a cabinet

Modelling or not the covers in a cabinet

Modelling or not the covers in a cabinet

(OP)
I'm doing the analysis of an electrical cabinet where a standard Rittal TS8 solution has been used.

The structure of the cabinet alone doesn't seem to reach the natural frequency that is required in this project.

We are considering taking into account the role of the covers and the door in the whole system more rigid. The door is made of 2 mm steel, and the covers use 2 mm aluminium.
Each cover is attached to the structure with 6 M6 bolts, and presses against the structure with a gasket in between.

My question would be first you would consider the role of the covers relevant, and we would not be adding any artificial stiffness.
Also, how would you model these covers? Would you just model the bolt connection, or also the contact between the cover, the gasket and the structure?

Any help or hint would be very much appreciated. Thank you!

David de Esteban
www.decnika.com

RE: Modelling or not the covers in a cabinet

Well, the covers are significant. You usually cannot include contact in a modal analysis because contact is a nonlinearity. I would try and bound the problem. Model it with connections only at the bolt holes, then model it with a gasket that is bonded to both surfaces. your real frequencies should be between those two solutions, probably closer to the second case than the first. If you have a cabinet of known performance, analyze that one first to figure out what works. I'm guessing this is a prelude to a response spectrum seismic analysis. My experience with cabinets like this is that most of the energy will be in the first mode, as indicated by the mass fraction and participation factors. You can take that frequency, plug it into your acceleration spectrum to get a g loading, add some missing mass if need be, and apply that as an equivalent static load to a nonlinear model with contact, plasticity, large deflections, etc.

Rick Fischer
Principal Engineer
Argonne National Laboratory

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources