×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

High Impedance Bus Protection Relay Tripping

High Impedance Bus Protection Relay Tripping

High Impedance Bus Protection Relay Tripping

(OP)
Hi Guys,

I’d like to know if any of you have a similar experience and kindly give your analysis on this situation: High impedance relay for bus protection (SEL 587Z) trips during switching of load on one particular feeder only.

Details:

> In steady-state, the relay impedance element reading is 87A=8, 87B=0, 87C=8. Other substations with similar setup measures 87A=87B=87C=0.
> As mentioned, tripping occurs only during feeder load switching with values of 87A & 87C = around 80 V, while 87B = 0. Trip setting is 68 V.
> CTs used have the same specifications. Also, another substation has the same setup with no recorded problem for the past two years.
> Power transformer was already energized prior to loading of that particular feeder.
> No problem switching adjacent feeders of the same substation.
> The same feeder line was transferred/bypassed to adjacent feeder – no tripping.
> Relay event records show that relatively high differential currents are only transient in nature (about a second). A small differential current values are measured at steady-state but not enough to cause a trip.

Please don’t hesitate to ask for additional details...

Basically, we already have an initial assessment and action plans. However, I would appreciate if any can give their analysis or share a similar experience.

Thanks!

RE: High Impedance Bus Protection Relay Tripping

Just put a 587Z scheme into service yesterday. Steady state readings with ~120MW @ 138kV had readings less than 50 mV at the relay.

A few things to look into:

Check individual CT currents at the summation point.

Perform a Burden Test (or lead resistance) on CT secondary circuits. A poor or loose connection could be present. CT Lead resistance is an important factor in the settings calculation. Using a DMM is not accurate enough. A micro ohm meter is suggested.

Have the CT's been tested for ratio, polarity and Excitation / Saturation, or review the commissioning data. I would not rely solely on specifications of the CT's, but actual test data. It is not uncommon to find incorrect CT's installed, or an installation error while commissioning CT's and breakers. Verify that only a single ground is present.

Are there any Surge Arrestors in the protection zone?

How was the 68V Trip setting derived? What is the available fault current? What is CT ANSI Class? What is the CT Lead resistance? Is 68V perhaps a bit too sensitive? This does not change the fact that 8V steady state is not (in my opinion) an acceptable value for a properly commissioned scheme.

Where are the CT's summed? Is this an outdoor AIS or indoor Metal Clad arrangement? Is the CT summing point more or less allowing for equal secondary lead resistance?

RE: High Impedance Bus Protection Relay Tripping

In such a case, my first doubt would be the polarities of CT connections for the particular feeder. Normally this would be identified if a 'stability test' had been carried out for all the feeders at the time of commissioning of the switchboard/ differential protection . If it is possible to take a short shutdown of the bus, carrying out a stability test by primary injection would reveal the problem.

Also check whether the stabilising resistance values are calculated and set correctly.However since the rest of the feeders are stable, chances of this being the reason are low.

RE: High Impedance Bus Protection Relay Tripping

SEL has papers on both switchgear applications, and arresters in the differential zone, for this relay.

68V does sound light, and may be worth a recalculation. But 8V standing on any phase in my applications cause an alarm for a CT problem.

RE: High Impedance Bus Protection Relay Tripping

(OP)
DTR,
All standard tests were performed for the CTs, wiring and relays - results are satisfactory. Basically, we have two major concerns here:
1. Tripping during load switching
In this case, the CTs and arresters are the primary suspects as they have transient characteristics. However, a delay was already set to cover arrester operations as with previous high impedance bus protection installations. The CTs though may need to be retested thoroughly and will be compared to other feeder CTs.

2. The 8 V reading during steady-state.
Here, CTs and loose wiring could be the culprits - more on CTs and less on wiring. Nonetheless, we've already considered to checking these.

For your queries:
1. Yes, there are arresters.
2. CTs are C800
3. CT currents are sum up in a terminal block near the relay. The wire lengths are not really equal due to different distance from switchgear.
4. Switchgear is indoor GIS.
5. The setting was calculated using SEL guideline. Actually, our previous installations have setting values on the same range.

I'll get back to you for other details you've asked.

Thanks much for your reply.

http://www.powerqualityworld.com

RE: High Impedance Bus Protection Relay Tripping

(OP)
Eletest,

Thanks much for the reply.

Yes, we've conducted PCIT prior to energization and everything was normal. Also, I forgot to mention that aside from the 8 V in 87A & 87C, the steady-state diff currents are about 5-7 A only, thus, lowering the polarity problem as the cause.

Thanks..

RE: High Impedance Bus Protection Relay Tripping

One Valero's plants tripped out due to setting the relay as the manual described. The white paper came from investigating the operation. I believe that Valero won't use a SEL-587Z anymore due to not liking SEL's explanation.

RE: High Impedance Bus Protection Relay Tripping

file:///C:/Users/00224811/Downloads/AN2008-01_20080522.pdf

RE: High Impedance Bus Protection Relay Tripping

(OP)
Cranky,

Yes, we're also looking at the CTs as the prime suspects but will also consider other possible reasons that forumers here may have encountered from similar experiences.

Also, the 8 V is bothering us, since our other 587Z installations would only show 1 V the most..

Thanks!

RE: High Impedance Bus Protection Relay Tripping

(OP)
HH,

Thanks, have already read it. That's why we've added a time delay of about 1-2 cyc. Other installations were stable but I think we still need to review it.

Also, I forgot to mention that high diff readings persist for about 30 cyc as per event records.

Thanks.

RE: High Impedance Bus Protection Relay Tripping

87A=8, 87B=0, 87C=8 and it trips when switching one particular feeder? I'd say you've got A and C CT secondaries rolled on that feeder. Disable the bus differential and swap the A and C polarity leads (after shorting of course) from that feeder at the summation point and recheck voltage at the relay.

RE: High Impedance Bus Protection Relay Tripping

I have to agree with stevenal - the steady-state voltages and the fact that it is tripping for switching on one feeder really points to a phase swap - somewhere - despite the previous testing.

RE: High Impedance Bus Protection Relay Tripping

Secondary testing on the CT wiring can be easily be performed with a 3 phase relay test set. Apply 3 Ph voltages of dissimilar magnitudes (Ia=20V, Ib=30V, Ic=40V) at the relay. Check all the way back to the CT's with a DMM.

IF primary injection testing was performed properly, I can't imagine how a phase swap would not be picked up. I'm assuming a stability or through fault test was performed and voltages checked at the relay.

I ran into a situation in GIS years back where the termination from the Oil Cable to the GIS was not properly isolated, creating a current split between the GIS and every other grounded item in the substation and the primary circuit. This was found during primary injection of the GIS. It turned out to be the bonding jumpers between the termination and the GIS was touching the GIS.

RE: High Impedance Bus Protection Relay Tripping

(OP)
stevenal and dpc,

As what I've replied to Eletest, it would seem at first that it is simply a polarity problem (A & C interchanged). However, I'd like to add that aside from the high impedance element voltages, the steady-state differential currents are relatively low: IA = 5-7, IB = 1, IC = 5-7. If it was simply a swapping of phases A & C, then, differential currents would have been much higher given that the angle difference would be around 120 deg.

Additional details:

Feeder Load = around 70 A @ 13.8 kV
CTR = 1500:5

This would mean differential currents of more than 70 A at steady-state for both IA and IC, if it was a case of phase swap...

Sorry for missing out these info...


Thanks!

RE: High Impedance Bus Protection Relay Tripping

(OP)
DTR,

Yes, PCIT and secondary loop tests were performed to check the phasing and metering accuracy of the relay...

When you say bonding jumpers, are you referring to the cable shield wires?

Thanks...

RE: High Impedance Bus Protection Relay Tripping

You will not see 120 degree phase displacement, since you will be summing the wrong currents from just the one feeder with the correct currents from all the others. The relay only sees the summation. You will also not see the 70A magnitude.

Swapped phases is not the same as a polarity problem, where the CT phases are correct, but the leads are reversed. Might be multiple problems present of course, but it's better to take one step at a time.

I disagree that your steady state differential currents are relatively low. A and C phases are significantly higher.

How many feeders/circuits are present? What are the currents, and are they sources or loads?

RE: High Impedance Bus Protection Relay Tripping

DTR,

Your unequal voltage application sounds pretty good. You suggest measuring at the CT, though. In my experience, http://www.eng-tips.com/the CT is rather inaccessible; and I've never even dealt with GIS. The closest one can reasonably get is at the CT shorting blocks. Verifying proper phasing at the shorting blocks does not ensure the correct shorting block was wired to the correct CT. The very best test is to use live load for this purpose, since it checks all the way through.

RE: High Impedance Bus Protection Relay Tripping

Don't know how that dead link got there when I hit the submit. Please substitute "the" above with no link.

RE: High Impedance Bus Protection Relay Tripping

(OP)
stevenal,

The trip occurred when we first load that feeder... When we tried loading the adjacent feeder, it was successful. So what we did was lengthen the delay to around 5 seconds, and load back the feeder that caused the trip. There was no trip but the relay recorded that the high impedance element was activated and would have trip had we not adjusted the delay. Subsequently, at steady-state the values I mentioned were noted...

Anyway, this is not a polarity problem. For the possibility of swapped phases, we also thought so at first, but the differential currents should be higher than 5-7 A. Also, PCIT, secondary loop tests and wire-wire as standard tests were conducted prior to energization.

Thanks...

RE: High Impedance Bus Protection Relay Tripping

Why do you expect swapped phases to provide more summation current? What are your loadings?

Not a whole lot of value to insisting things tested out correctly. Either your testing method was incorrect or it fell short of testing what is wrong.

(86V/2000 ohm relay burden)*(1500/5) = 12.9 A primary summation current at pickup. You are running at over 50% of pickup with no fault on the system. This is guaranteed to trip on the first through fault even if you set the delay to ride out the switching transient.

You offered to provide more info if asked and I'm asking. Number of circuits summed? Steady state loadings on each?

RE: High Impedance Bus Protection Relay Tripping

(OP)
stevenal,

There were only two feeders up, the one with the problem (70 A) and the adjacent line (130 A)...

Anyway, I'd appreciate to see your calculations for the differential current in case of a phase swap...

Thanks...

http://www.powerqualityworld.com

RE: High Impedance Bus Protection Relay Tripping

One problem with testing CT polarity is when the tech.'s encounter a reverse CT they assume it is there testing, and will reverse there CT test leads. I've seen this happen, and the test is invalid.

The best method to detect polarty is with a pulse of DC current on the primary, and watch the secondary with a sensitive center balance meter (not a digital meter). All the CT's should deflect the same direction, provided the primary DC is in the same direction. This test is followed by demagnitizing the CT (which could also be a problem in itself).

Also if this is switchgear, SEL recommends pickup values above 150 volts, which is higher than what you have set.

Question: Why do you have the settings so low? Are you concerned about insulator leakage?

RE: High Impedance Bus Protection Relay Tripping

I'm not sure how 70 and 130 are expected to sum to zero. Perhaps there is a third circuit supplying 200 amps so Kirchoff is satisfied?

Also, you state that only two feeders are up. Do you have more CTs wired in from open feeders?

DTR already said it, but ensure your CT secondary neutral is grounded at one location only for the entire system, typically at the relay. Multiple grounds will cause circulating currents that will affect your results.

RE: High Impedance Bus Protection Relay Tripping

(OP)
Cranky,

The settings were calculated based on SEL guidelines. The 68 V trip setting have a time delay of 1.25 cyc to compensate arrester operation and/or CT unbalance during high current (inrush or external fault). Since you can set two 87 stages, the SEL guideline also recommends to set the other stage to 200 V but without a delay.

I'm not sure about the polarity problem since the differential current is only 5 A. As I understand, a polarity problem shall add up the current of that particular phase, if I'm not mistaken.

Thanks...

RE: High Impedance Bus Protection Relay Tripping

(OP)
stevenal,

I apologize for the confusion...

The circuits summed involve two feeder and the main line. Actually, there are four feeders in total but at that time we only loaded two feeders.

Main Line - 200 A
Problem Feeder - 70 A
Adjacent Feeder - 130 A
Other 2 Feeders - No Load (Breakers Open)

Yes, we'll include checking for possible multiple grounding on the secondary circuits of the problem feeder...

Thanks...

RE: High Impedance Bus Protection Relay Tripping

(OP)
stevenal,

I apologize for the confusion...

The circuits summed involve two feeder and the main line. Actually, there are four feeders in total but at that time we only loaded two feeders.

Main Line - 200 A
Problem Feeder - 70 A
Adjacent Feeder - 130 A
Other 2 Feeders - No Load (Breakers Open)

Yes, we'll include checking for possible multiple grounding on the secondary circuits of the problem feeder...

Thanks...

RE: High Impedance Bus Protection Relay Tripping

(OP)
Guys,

Aside from possible wiring mistakes, we're also looking at CT remanence as the possible cause - since it affects CT performance during high current such as load switching and reduces CT accuracy (e.g. ratio) even at steady-state.

Kindly share your experiences...

Thanks...

RE: High Impedance Bus Protection Relay Tripping

With just the three circuits, I agree a phase swap would cause a much higher summation current.

Since all the CT secondaries are tied together, you need to look everywhere for grounds, not just on the one feeder. A likely location may be one of the unused feeders.

RE: High Impedance Bus Protection Relay Tripping

(OP)
stevenal,

Well noted... Thanks much for giving time to share your thoughts...


Thanks...

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources