Is ANSYS capable of doing this ?
Is ANSYS capable of doing this ?
(OP)
i m working on a project with fiber glass that has to be saturated with resin by the application of vacuum.
Is it possible to find the vacuum pressure, fill time of mold, point(s) of application of vacuum and resin inlet point(s) through ANSYS ?
Is it possible to find the vacuum pressure, fill time of mold, point(s) of application of vacuum and resin inlet point(s) through ANSYS ?





RE: Is ANSYS capable of doing this ?
Rick Fischer
Principal Engineer
Argonne National Laboratory
RE: Is ANSYS capable of doing this ?
please reply to this thread
RE: Is ANSYS capable of doing this ?
Since you haven't gotten much of a response here I would try the CFX forum on www.cfd-online.com. There are plenty of CFX experts there and I've gotten great advice in the past.
Good luck,
Dave
RE: Is ANSYS capable of doing this ?
RE: Is ANSYS capable of doing this ?
Rick Fischer
Principal Engineer
Argonne National Laboratory
RE: Is ANSYS capable of doing this ?
RE: Is ANSYS capable of doing this ?
Rick Fischer
Principal Engineer
Argonne National Laboratory
RE: Is ANSYS capable of doing this ?
RE: Is ANSYS capable of doing this ?
got to love development via acquisitons strategy. simulia doesn't have those problems.
RE: Is ANSYS capable of doing this ?
RE: Is ANSYS capable of doing this ?
Not sure what you mean by APDL gets zero development. Ansys Parametric Design Language (APDL) is the Ansys command language. The Workbench environment writes an APDL script everytime it runs a job. No APDL, no Workbench. APDL is still used extensively in industry. All the Ansys power users use it extensively. Newbie millenials raised on GUI's dont like it because it requires learning, and gravitate towards Workbench. MAPDL (Mechanical APDL) is the latest name the marketing twits have tackled on traditional non-Workbench Ansys, which was known as Ansys Classic. The primary difference is that MAPDL uses the XOX geometry kernal, which is obsolete and no longer developed, while workbench is Parasolids based. Any new capability in Workbench, except for meshing, is in MAPDL. So new elements, new solvers, new materials are in MAPDL. There are new scripting capabilites in Workbench, and ACT (Application Customization Toolkit) which looks like it's aimed at APDL. I havent looked at it yet, but I suspect it also writes APDL scripts. I wonder what the future holds
One thing that concerns me is that at R15 Ansys undocumented Design Optimization, Topology Optimization, and HF Emag. The excuse was that these were old technologies, and by the way, we have new products to replace them, at a price. They claim this is not a bait-and-switch tactic, but really how dumb do they think we are? At the rate they are going, they will have to change the name to Monophysics. Ansys, as a company, has been going down hill since Swanson left. The marketing twits seem to hate the original Ansys product, and are hell bent to change it for the sake of changing it. I wonder what John Swanson thinks of all this.
Rick Fischer
Principal Engineer
Argonne National Laboratory