×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Lower hardness but same YS

Lower hardness but same YS

Lower hardness but same YS

(OP)
Can someone explain me the possible reasons why after homogenization of an austenitic steel, I obtain smaller hardness (about 100HV smaller) but the same yield strength? For me it's not logical... Lower hardness is probably conencted with recrystallization and grain growth, but shouldn't it be connected with lower YS?

RE: Lower hardness but same YS

First, there is not enough background information because more information helps to narrow or eliminate possible factors. Second, was this a solution heat treatment performed on the same heat of austenitic stainless steel? Was the material worked or what was the material condition before heat treatment? How did you measure yield strength and what about tensile strength values in addition to hardness testing?

RE: Lower hardness but same YS

(OP)
Samples were first as-forged (higher hardness) and then annealed in 1000C and quenched in water. Yield strength was measured by compression test.

If not in this case, what can be a general explanation of this phenomenon?

RE: Lower hardness but same YS

Are you measuring true stress/strain in compression?
Of course they don't agree, they are in very different conditions.
Strain hardening, especially if it was from warm work can result in interesting (seemingly inconsistent) properties.
Now if you have multiple annealed samples that differ from each other that would be different.


I have generated many samples of the same SS alloy that have

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Plymouth Tube

RE: Lower hardness but same YS

(OP)
What I meant is that YS after annealing should get lower (as hardness), but in my case is the same for as-forged and annealed alloy (even if hardness decreases).

RE: Lower hardness but same YS

Note that hardness correlates in some manner to tensile strength, but not necessarily yield strength.

RE: Lower hardness but same YS

Hardness correlates roughly to both, but the correlation is not as good between yield and hardness. There's a good paper "Correlation of Yield Strength and Tensile Strength with Hardness for Steels" that attempts this for various microstructures and steel types. This info was pulled from data from the Colorado School of Mines, and provides information for this correlation or lack-thereof.

RE: Lower hardness but same YS

In a cold worked material I can change the engineering yield (0.2% offset) very easily with no impact on the grain size or tensile strength.
In wire it is common to add just a little more work in the form of flexing the wire by running it looped around a roller.
The slight bending back and forth causes redistribution of residual stresses and can greatly lower the measured yield strength.

The should be no correlation between the properties of cold or warm worked part and the same material after annealing other than the reduction of UTS. Everything else depends on conditions.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Plymouth Tube

RE: Lower hardness but same YS

Just ran across this nugget in Corrosion of Austenitic Stainless Steels that may provide an explantion:

The twin spacing does not affect the proof stress because the stacking fault energy, which controls the work-hardening rate, has little or no effect at the
low strains at which the proof stress is measured. The twin spacing is much more important than the grain size in controlling the tensile strength because the effect of stacking fault energy on the work-hardening rate, and hence on the tensile strength, is quite significant. However, in high stacking fault energy austenites, in which there are relatively few twins, the tensile strength will depend on the grain size, following a Hall-Petch type of relationship.



See my previous post regarding how hardness correlates better to ultimate tensile strength. You could have more closely spaced twins in the higher hardness/UTS material and more widely spaced twins in the low hardness/UTS material. Just one possibility for your case.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources