×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

TnxTower Program Anomaly

TnxTower Program Anomaly

TnxTower Program Anomaly

(OP)
I originally posted this in the Transmission Tower forum but received no responses. I will red flag the Transmission forum post.

I ran a 59 foot, 12 sided monopole with a circular stiffened baseplate, and 18 anchor bolts with the stiffeners between every other bolt. The tower rating was 102.2 % with the baseplate design controlling the rating. This is the actual existing tower condition.

I ran the same thing again with a plane baseplate of the same thickness and no stiffeners, and obtained a tower rating of 61.3%. This seems inconsistent... However...

Could the program be looking at the effect of a 12 sided tower with only 9 stiffeners and the induced stress on the tower walls since some of the stiffeners are between the tower bend points in the 12 sided figure rather than at the bend?

I ran the program again with the number of stiffeners doubled, and the rating dropped to 51.1%, half that with half the number of stiffeners, and less than the unstiffened plate.

This makes no logical sense to me. What is driving the solution? ponder

FYI: TnxTower was formerly RISA Tower, but is now a separate company.

Mike McCann, PE, SE (WA)


RE: TnxTower Program Anomaly

(OP)
Well, I think that I have found my answer on page 77 of this publication.

http://www.towernx.com/downloads/Technical_Manual_...

Where it states that the gusset is designed ignoring any contribution of the base plate. The gusset acts as a vertical plate only, and the gusset imparting a bending stress on the pole wall.

Looks like the analysis is very conservative for the ease of analysis to me. A finite element approach would be better here...

Mike McCann, PE, SE (WA)


RE: TnxTower Program Anomaly

Monopole bases are tricky. It's been a few year since I've looked in detail at them. But, I would have pointed you towards that same reference. Or, towards the TowerNumerics tech support e-mail address.

I've thought for awhile that Tower Numerics should develop a specific program (similar to RISABase) targeted mainly towards FEM solutions for monopole base plates. It would be very useful for the tower industry (and vertical vessel design for heavy industrial projects). It is a bit of a specialty application, and Peter does have a lot on his plate. But, you should send him that request anyway. Those sorts of requests have a lot more weight coming from real engineers than they have coming from another FEM jockey. wink

RE: TnxTower Program Anomaly

(OP)
FEM is exactly what I suggested to him yesterday. Great minds think alike.tiphat

Mike McCann, PE, SE (WA)


Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources