×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Fatigue analysis and normalized material

Fatigue analysis and normalized material

Fatigue analysis and normalized material

(OP)
Dear all,

A spec from an engineering firm asking carbon steel to be normalized for cyclic service. Based on Div 2 Part 5, the fatigue analysis has nothing to do with whether the material is normalized. Also, the algorithm behind FEA to do stress analysis is just stiffness matrix, which only involves "E", the Young's modulus, and "I", moment of inertia, nothing to do with normalized or not.

Yes normalized material is better with a cost, but I don't think it is necessary nor can it increase fatigue life from code or FEA. What is your thought ?

RE: Fatigue analysis and normalized material

That is very odd - I have never seen that before. I agree that it doesn't seem to make much sense.

RE: Fatigue analysis and normalized material

Typically, normalization heat treatment results in uniform grain texture and mechanical properties (slightly higher strength and toughness (Charpy) with carbon and low alloy steels. So, this may have been where we need a fatigue analysis and by the way the material is supplied as normalized versus annealed or hot finished for service conditions.

RE: Fatigue analysis and normalized material

(OP)
I think any heat treatment on the material before welding has no merit at all. If it has any merit, the FEA and Code have to be re-written. It is only to let someone who does not know how the code is written or how FEA is programmed to feel "good" by asking normalized material.

We all know that the major concern for fatigue analysis is at the discontinuity areas. The best way is to perform PWHT to remove the residual stress due to forming and welding, such that the vessel is stress-free prior to operating loading and the fatigue cycles can be accuratly predicted, rather than asking for normalized materials, which has no advantage to remove residual stress nor providing better theoretical fatigue life from code or FEA.

RE: Fatigue analysis and normalized material

Quote:

I think any heat treatment on the material before welding has no merit at all

What? What do think are bulk mechanical properties in normalized and quenched and tempered plate, bar, castings remote from weld regions? Why is there subcritical post weld heat treatment by Code versus a mandate to reheat treat after welding (normalization and Q&T)? Better think again.

RE: Fatigue analysis and normalized material

(OP)
metemgr,
You are misunderstading my point. TGS4 has pointed out that askig normalized material for cyclic service is very odd, that is also my past experience that I never see people asking for normalized material for cyclic service until recently I saw one company's spec asking for that.
Simply put, plain carbon steel is good for cyclic service based on Div. 2 and finite element analysis. There is no need to use normalized material to improve bulk material property. If there is anything to do, I will say PWHT to kill residual stress from forming and welding. However, no one will do that because it is not madatory by code for cyclic service. I believe TGS4 will understand my point much well because he is Div 2 expert.

RE: Fatigue analysis and normalized material

Understood. It may be that the request for normalized material is unrelated to fatigue analysis and could be related to fracture or notch toughness requirements in addition to fatigue (cyclic service).

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources