×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

ISO 14405-2 Annex A like pictures

ISO 14405-2 Annex A like pictures

ISO 14405-2 Annex A like pictures

(OP)
I am trying to convince some folks around here that dimensioning with ± is a high risk definition (not a robust definition) when not applied for feature of size. I have (from some other discussions here/ threads) a picture from ISO 14405-2 (Annex A). THANK YOU pmarc!

The question or request I have, there are some other examples/pictures available somewhere in the GD and T literature showing the above issue (not very robust product definition). I really would like to have more ammunition for by battle.
Annex A says: “The first in this annex shows several possible interpretations and associated explanations. The other examples only show where the use of ± tolerances causes ambiguity”

Basically I am looking for “ the other examples”
Thank you for your help

RE: ISO 14405-2 Annex A like pictures

Thanks, CH & pmarc
Frank

RE: ISO 14405-2 Annex A like pictures

Fsincox,

There are more "scary pictures" in Henrik S. Nielsen's book, pages 49-52.

You have one, right?

RE: ISO 14405-2 Annex A like pictures

(OP)
CH,

""scary pictures" in Henrik S. Nielsen's book, pages 49-52"

Can you post them? I would like to get as many as I can.
Anyone who has those "GD and T related" pictures, I am interested to get them.

I am preparing myself for Halloween.

Again, the purpose is : "I really would like to have more ammunition for by battle"

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources