×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Cedar Lagging in Soldier pile wall

Cedar Lagging in Soldier pile wall

Cedar Lagging in Soldier pile wall

(OP)
I am designing a canal wall using soldier pile with timber lagging. Timber is required due to constraint of being "restoration of historic properties", otherwise I would use concrete lagging. Additionally, I cannot use ANY wood preservatives to treat the timber. The front of the wall will have variable height water and the back of the wall will retain engineered backfill. Considering the wet/dry cycles and soil exposure, this wall seems doomed to rot even using Cedar or Redwood lagging. Regardless, the client wants to move forward using Cedar. Any suggestions for protecting the lagging from rot? I am proposing using a 12 inch wide drainage rock behind the wall wrapped in geotextile separator fabric. Thanks in advance!

RE: Cedar Lagging in Soldier pile wall

(OP)
Could geocomposite fabric drain or drainage composite materials provide a reliable separation to lengthen lifespan?

RE: Cedar Lagging in Soldier pile wall

My older "Wood Handbook" from US forest Product Lab has a table of resistance to decay. Left side column shows the best, but even then with species there is high variability.

Note the "2" designation as the best.

Not only the lagging, but also the piles should be decay resistant. Getting resistant piles may be difficult.

RE: Cedar Lagging in Soldier pile wall

(OP)
Thanks for the decay table oldestguy. The species with high decay resistance identified with the 2 superscript are not readily available in my area, while Western Cedar is. I specified a drainage system using Mirafi G200N geotextile composite fabric abutting the back face of the wall. This is a 10mm thick double-layered filter fabric with voided core. It will extend continuously from top of wall down and fold under the bottom of the lagging to act as a weep system when the canal is dewatered. When the canal is full this voided system will likely fill with water, but it will wash out continuously due to current flow. The most significant benefit is that it will not allow direct soil contact. It is not a fool-proof system, but ideally in will prolong the lagging's lifespan.

RE: Cedar Lagging in Soldier pile wall

Here is an idea. The house I bought 4 years ago is handicap accessible so the front entry is at grade, no step. Thus the section of front building wall (wood interior) wall above the foundation is below grade about a foot. Wall has brick exterior sitting on brick ledge "supposedly" with a flashing in back. Contractor was no help when asked about flashing says "If they put it in". Not trusting that, I painted the brick below grade with the coating that is supposed to be masonry waterproof and laid a sheet of black plastic against that. Who knows if it helps. I have seen no sign of problems looking and probe testing on inside. No outside efflorescence. House is 14 years old.

So for your wall, in addition to the drainage fabric,and other features, a sheet of plastic, say 5 mil, against the timber also may help. Of course this assumes your rear fill and drainage materials will prevent a build up of excessive hydro pressure behind the wall.

RE: Cedar Lagging in Soldier pile wall

Why don't you use both the structural concrete panel back wall and a non-structural sacrificial cedar plank front?

Mike McCann, PE, SE (WA)


RE: Cedar Lagging in Soldier pile wall

(OP)
msquared48, thanks for the suggestion. I also thought about a timber faux front facing, but to be economical this would only be a 2x or 3x veneer which may be subject to rotting out faster as it has less section area. I would estimate that replacing a faux facing versus replacing structural lagging would be nearly as difficult and thus nearly as costly, especially if it needs to be done more frequently. As is, I am proposing 6x cedar while structurally I only need 4x. This allows a reasonable section loss and it will still be adequate. The client did allow the portion of wall below low water level to use a precast concrete panel for lagging. The upper portion will be the cedar.

RE: Cedar Lagging in Soldier pile wall

I guess concrete lagging that is stained to look like wood and poured with a wood grain architectural finish is no good? I don't like the idea of using wood lagging in a water environment. msquared48's idea is a good one and could probably be done so that the replacement of the wood façade is easy.

www.PeirceEngineering.com

RE: Cedar Lagging in Soldier pile wall

(OP)
PEinc, thanks for the input. Per the "standards for restoration of historic properties" it has to be real wood. This is a replacement design, and the existing wall is about 60yrs old and used treated timber lagging. The key word being treated. Now I get to duplicate appearance without the option of using preservatives due to environmental constraints. I proposed a non-toxic treatment, but it was not viable due to the project schedule relative to approval process for a product not on the QPL. I am painted into a corner. So it goes. I will consider re-explore the concrete lagging with cedar facing. In any case, I have done my due diligence to inform the stakeholders that this is not a preferred solution from an engineering perspective.

RE: Cedar Lagging in Soldier pile wall

The is probably too dense for pressure treatment. This hard wood is probably too dense for pressure treatment.

www.PeirceEngineering.com

RE: Cedar Lagging in Soldier pile wall

We have specified IPE for pedestrian bridge decking per the fabricators recommendation. "They" claim 20 years of maintenance free usage. Very very dense wood and looks spectacular when new but will haze to grey in a year or so. Pressure washer will make it look new again.

I like the idea of precast lagging with IPE facing. Maybe flange mount the IPE for easy removal/replacement if necessary?

RE: Cedar Lagging in Soldier pile wall

(OP)
I checked the availability of IPE and it only comes in 1x or 5/4x thickness, and I don't like the idea of a laminated or built-up section in this wet environment. I need at least 3x, preferably 4x. I think the cedar is still my best option for a locally available product. I estimate a 20+yr life span if I drain it, provide soil contact separation, and increase design thickness to allow for section loss. The next best solution is concrete lagging with cedar veneer facing. I appreciate all the discussion feedback. Thanks!

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources