×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Soldier Pile Design

Soldier Pile Design

Soldier Pile Design

(OP)
So I have noticed there are quite a number of empirical procedures to determine embedment depth of a soldier pile. The IBC and AASHTO have procedures that are super easy, but yield very different answers depending on how deep you are going. As usual, there is never the money to perform a true soil-structure interaction analysis, so we structural guys are left with choosing from the dozens of analytical methods scattered throughout codes, doctoral papers, textbooks, etc.

Does anybody have a ton of experience with soldier pile design that can provide some suggestions?

RE: Soldier Pile Design

Check the AASHTO Bridge Design Specifications. Any of their newer editions have earth pressure diagrams and equations for designing non-gravity, retaining walls with discrete vertical members (soldier beams). Other state agencies, like CALTRANS, have design guides dealing with these walls. For soldier beam walls, you will find more useable information in AASHTO that in most text books.

www.PeirceEngineering.com

RE: Soldier Pile Design

(OP)
Thanks, PEinc

RE: Soldier Pile Design

(OP)
After reading AASHTO 13.6.1.1 - Embedment for cohesionless soil, I am unclear how to proceed with this method.

They mention that Broms' procedure is for ultimate loads that require a undercapacity factor and overload factor. I have been given allowable passive pressure from the geotech. Does this mean I need to apply a load factor to the shear and moment in order to use Broms' method? It suggests using an overload factor of 2 to 3 - why does that seem so high? LRFD load factor would only be 1.6 for the retaining wall loads.

Thoughts?

RE: Soldier Pile Design

Probably anything you read about Broms was written before LRFD. Factor your driving loads (earth pressure and surcharge load). Apply a resistance factor to the passive resistance if a permanent wall. Apply the passive resistance to 3x the soldier beam width or width of the concreted drill hole. For a permanent wall, apply the active and surcharge pressures to the rear width of the driven soldier beam or to the width of the concreted drill hole for the soldier beam. Solve for the soldier beam embedment depth. Use it without any additional safety factor, but use about 5' minimum embedment in soil, less in rock.
Check the required load factors and resistance factors for the code you are required to follow.

www.PeirceEngineering.com

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources