×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Unite only specific adjacent faces on two solids; NX7.5

Unite only specific adjacent faces on two solids; NX7.5

Unite only specific adjacent faces on two solids; NX7.5

(OP)
Hi, I need some help from some NX experts - looks like this is the right place.

I have two solids - two revolved halves of a ring. They are both revolved based on the same sketch and therefore have the exact same profile. At one end, the two revolves have 2 adjacent faces (Clean cut prodile and zero distance between faces). At the other end, the two bodies have a more complex structure, but still have a total of 4 adjacent faces (zero distance).

I need to unite the two bodies to one body, but only at the end where the two revolves meet in 2 adjacent faces. The remaining adjacent faces must not be joined.

Unite command will result in all adjacent faces being joined. Sew command will result in a hollow structure, even though Solid is selected and the profiles of the faces selected are exactly the same. I have tried many other commands with no luck.

Any help will be appreciated! Thanks!

Best regards,
Morten T Nielsen

RE: Unite only specific adjacent faces on two solids; NX7.5

Hi,

Difficult without a pic, but I don't think this is possible because two "adjacent" faces can't be in the same physical space, either physically in the real world, or mathematically in CAD. CAD can't differentiate between two positions if they are the same.

If I'm understanding the part it's kind of like a split ring, in which case you'd be best just to model a (small) gap in I think.

www.jcb.com
NX 8.5 with TC 8.3

RE: Unite only specific adjacent faces on two solids; NX7.5

(OP)
I will make a simple model to better illustrate the problem, but you are correct that it is just a split ring. The model needs to be divided in two bodies initially, in order to model the complex structure, where the ends meet.

The trick with the small gap is what we have used so far, but the zero gap is actually dimensioned on the final drawing, and therefore I would like to do without it.

RE: Unite only specific adjacent faces on two solids; NX7.5

I'd stick with the small gap, as long as it's smaller than the number of DP on your drawing you'll be fine.

Or you could just model a solid ring and then draw the split on with curves.

www.jcb.com
NX 8.5 with TC 8.3

RE: Unite only specific adjacent faces on two solids; NX7.5

I think you could play a trick with the modelling tolerances to get the ends you want to unite other adjacent edge show a near zero gap. The problem is trying to avoid generating a non-manifold solid.

Khimani Mohiki
Design Engineer - Aston Martin
NX8.5

RE: Unite only specific adjacent faces on two solids; NX7.5

(OP)
Khimani, do you mean the general modeling tolerances under Preferences?

RE: Unite only specific adjacent faces on two solids; NX7.5

If its only for representation in the model and drawing then why not do a full revolve (to get a ring) and then divide the faces at the desired point with a surface, that way it will appear correct in the model and be dimensionable in the drawing.

Even if you did manage to find a way to unite just 2 of the adjacent faces, the other adjacent faces would never be visible or usable as far as I can see.

Khimani Mohiki
Design Engineer - Aston Martin
NX8.5

RE: Unite only specific adjacent faces on two solids; NX7.5

(OP)
Sorry - the picture shows a simplified model. The open end of the ring has a slightly more complex shape than illustrated, but since this is work related, I didn't want to show too much.
Various roundings and chamfers are applied to the model at the open end, and therefore I can't just divide it by a surface.
It is a ring for sealing around a piston, and it is machined and then bend afterwards, which results in the complex shapes being adjacent.

I think this simply isn't possible.

Thanks anyway for the suggestions!

RE: Unite only specific adjacent faces on two solids; NX7.5

Apply a small offset to the faces that you do not want to merge, perform the unite operation, and finally offset the faces back out to where they should be. I know this work-around is a bit clumsy, but it will work. Perhaps you could give the offset features a meaningful name or add a comment that shows up in the part navigator to flag that these are intentional and necessary.

www.nxjournaling.com

RE: Unite only specific adjacent faces on two solids; NX7.5

(OP)
I tried with offset - unite - offset, but it unites the faces pr. default.

Carlharr, I think you are correct, in that it is not possible, in the physics of CAD, to have the same body with different faces in the exact same space.

RE: Unite only specific adjacent faces on two solids; NX7.5

Hi Morten, it's not possible in physical bodies either, which is what made me think about CAD.

Thanks, have a good weekend.

www.jcb.com
NX 8.5 with TC 8.3

RE: Unite only specific adjacent faces on two solids; NX7.5

Yes, this is one of the situations which results in a non-manifold body. By definition, non-manifold bodies cannot exist in nature, therefore we've decided to limit NX to producing only manifold solid models. The only exceptions are some special cases which are allowed when creating finite element models but this is done as part of the model preparation and meshing tasks and does not actually alter the topology of the parent models.

John R. Baker, P.E.
Product 'Evangelist'
Product Engineering Software
Siemens PLM Software Inc.
Industry Sector
Cypress, CA
Siemens PLM:
UG/NX Museum:

To an Engineer, the glass is twice as big as it needs to be.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources