×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Foundation Overturning Reduction in ASCE 7

Foundation Overturning Reduction in ASCE 7

Foundation Overturning Reduction in ASCE 7

(OP)
For those who regularly use ASCE 7 in their practice, do you typically take advantage of the 25% reduction in foundation overturning permitted by ASCE 7-10 section 12.13.4? The same provision was included in earlier editions of ASCE 7 as well. My suspicion is that this provision is not widely employed in practice. As I read it, the provision applies strictly to overturning (not sliding) and only applies to foundation members. Of course, you have to meet the limitations set forth in ASCE 7 as well (use of the Equivalent Lateral Force procedure and the structure in question cannot be an inverted pendulum or cantilevered column structure). Since the vertical distribution of seismic forces in the Equivalent Lateral Force procedure is based on the first mode of vibration and that distribution overestimates the overturning force, it makes sense that a reduction in overturning is permitted.

RE: Foundation Overturning Reduction in ASCE 7

NO. Not comfortable with that provision.

Mike McCann, PE, SE (WA)


RE: Foundation Overturning Reduction in ASCE 7

An explanation from the 2009 NEHRP provisions:
C12.13.4 Reduction of Foundation Overturning. Since the vertical distribution of forces prescribed for use with the
equivalent lateral force procedure is intended to envelope story shears, overturning moments are exaggerated. (See
Section C12.13.3.) Such moments will be lower where multiple modes respond, so a 25 percent reduction is permitted for
design (strength and stability) of the foundation using this procedure. This reduction is not permitted for inverted pendulum
or cantilevered column type structures, which typically have a single mode of response.
Since the modal response spectrum analysis procedure more accurately reflects the actual distribution of shears and
overturning moments, the permitted reduction is only 10 percent.

RE: Foundation Overturning Reduction in ASCE 7

I keep it in my back pocket and save it for special circumstances.

I have utilized it occasionally, but I can't think of a time where I have invoked it up-front in design.





RE: Foundation Overturning Reduction in ASCE 7

I use it all the time. Firstly, it saves the owner a bit of money which is one of my mandates as a dutiful consultant. Secondly, I see no reason to arbitrarily increase the global safety for one particular element.

The greatest trick that bond stress ever pulled was convincing the world it didn't exist.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources