×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

B31.3 Materials
2

B31.3 Materials

B31.3 Materials

(OP)
Is there any paragraphs in ASME B31.3 such as ASME Sec 1 PG-11.1 that allows the use of materials without material test reports. I have a blind flange I would like to use it has all the required markings but no MTR.

RE: B31.3 Materials

Flanges and other fittings are assumed to be acceptable to the spec you find stamped into them. That's why so many of us refuse to use parts from known counterfitters - cough[china]cough.

If I bought that flange from a reputable supplier, I would use it. Assuming that it was stamped A-105 and B16.5.

RE: B31.3 Materials

Interpretation: 21-03
Subject: ASME B31.3-2004, Paras. K323.1.5, Product Analysis and K346.2(b), Required Records
Date Issued: March 29, 2006
File: 06-298
Question: Does ASME B31.3-2004 require any Certified Material Test Reports (CMTR)?
Reply: No; however, see paras. K323.1.5 and K346.2(b).

Hope that helps,
Cheers,
DD

RE: B31.3 Materials

just do the PMI for material verification ..and dimensions check   then you can use ...
Manufacturer marking is also in punching you also can ask for MTC i.e. 3.1 or 3.2


Lalit Mohan Kothari
  TUV NORD
"Dreams and dedication makes powerful combination "  

RE: B31.3 Materials

Lalit-

What PMI device or method would you recommend to Gemmell that would help to distinguish a 70 UTS carbon steel plate from a 55 UTS carbon steel plate?

RE: B31.3 Materials

Umm, the flanges aren't made from plate, so how is this relevant? Piping components here, not vessel components. ASME VIII has fairly strict traceability and documentation requirements, whereas B31.3 permits markings on FITTINGS to be trusted as noted. The exception, and where we draw the line, is for PIPE itself, for which MTRs are pretty much a requirement because the markings aren't on every portion of that pipe, nor are they made in a durable fashion.

RE: B31.3 Materials

Well, strictly speaking, one could easily build a Section VIII-1 vessel without MTR's. Section VIII-1 allows for markings (permanent or otherwise) on fittings and pipe to be considered good enough if so stated in the fab shop's QA manual. As for B31.3, I am not aware of a requirement for an MTR in this code - even for piping fabricated of rolled plate. While owner/users may wisely choose to add this as a requirement for their projects, it is not an ASME requirement.

The OP was asking about a blind flange, which could easily be fabricated of plate material.

But I'd still like to know what PMI device could distinguish between grades of the same specification of steel. Simply put, I'm not aware of any such thing - but I am not a specialist in that field. In some cases there could be substantial value in simply identifying one carbon steel spec from another, e.g. A53 from A106.

RE: B31.3 Materials

Nor am I. Pretty much impossible by PMI, especially considering that many such materials are certified to multiple specifications by the mill.
We regularly see MTR's certifying a pipe to API 5L, A53 and A106.

RE: B31.3 Materials

For distinguishing grades of carbon steel, you have to know Carbon content. Sounds simplistic & easy; it's not. XRF - xray fluorescence - 'gun' cannot give Carbon [or Nitrogen]. So you have to go to a more physical test - these machines used to use a spark, and left an 'arc strike' to deal with. Current ones use plasma or laser, so you get left with a small, smooth divot. I usually refer to this as 'semi-nondestructive' testing. The fitting/pipe is slightly marred, but usually nobody worries about a small, smooth blemish.

Also, it doesn't about multiple certifications. Ignore all of the overlapping ones except the one you need. Either the material in question meets that spec, or it doesn't. In my experience, the off-spec materials have been 5- and 9-Chrome [too lean], 316 stainless [too lean, too little Molly], and gold wedding rings [12-karat, instead of 18-k].

RE: B31.3 Materials

If a company is going to the bother of putting an ASTM/B16 marking on a component which doesn't meet the spec, do you think they are capable of also generating a fraudulent mill cert?  We've seen it...

The question was whether or not B31.3 requires mill certs for B16 piping components with durable markings.  The answer to that question has been provided, and it's no.  It's a popular myth that MTRs for such components is a code requirement rather than a client preference.

As to the usefulness of PMI, Duwe6 has outlined it pretty well.  Note that some XRF machines are blind to fairly heavy elements such as Ti and hence can't distinguish 321 from 304 etc.  They absolutely cannot do carbon content.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources