×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Article on Brushless Motor Terminology
2

Article on Brushless Motor Terminology

Article on Brushless Motor Terminology

2
(OP)
Hi All:

I have an article up at engineering.com that covers common points of confusion on brushless motor terminology. It can be found here:

http://www.engineering.com/DesignerEdge/DesignerEdgeArticles/ArticleID/8131/What-is-a-DC-Brushless-Motor.aspx

Quote:

A DC brushless motor is an AC motor. Specifically, it is a permanent-magnet synchronous (AC) motor (PMSM).

So why, you may ask, is it called a DC brushless motor?

The term "DC brushless motor" is a marketing term. The intent was to sell these motors as replacements for DC brush motors in servo applications....

For a long time this had been kicking around in my head as an FAQ for this motors forum. Would you like to see a form of it here? If so, what additions and/or changes would you like to see?

Curt Wilson
Delta Tau Data Systems

RE: Article on Brushless Motor Terminology

Oh, so that's why they call is a brushless dc motor.
I always wondered about that. Good article.

=====================================
(2B)+(2B)' ?

RE: Article on Brushless Motor Terminology

That article explained a lot, Curt. Thanks.

Darrell Hambley P.E.
SENTEK Engineering, LLC

RE: Article on Brushless Motor Terminology

Nice article. Have you read James Mevey's thesis "Sensorless Field Oriented Control of Brushless Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors?" In it he has a nice section discussing terminology. He did a literature search and found the brushless PM motors have been called the following names:

  • BACM brushless AC motor
  • BDCM brush/brushless DC motor
  • BLDC brushless DC
  • BLSM brushless servo/synchronous motor
  • BPM brush/brushless PM
  • ECBM electronically commutated brushless motor
  • ECDCM electronically commutated DC motor
  • EDCM equivalent DC motor
  • PMAC permanent magnet AC
  • PMBDC permanent magnet brush/brushless DC
  • PMDC permanent magnet DC
  • PMSM permanent magnet synchronous motor
  • SPM sinusoidal/surface/synchronous PM
  • SPMSM surface PM synchronous motor
  • SMPMSM surface mounted PM synchronous motor
My preferred terminology is what you use in your article - PMSM. I'm not even a fan of "trapezoidally wound" and "sinusoidally wound" because it's more of a continuum than separate buckets that they are placed in. When I get asked about this I usually just say that all PMSM's are functionally the same in that their method of torque production is identical. The main difference is that different PMSM's can be designed with different rotor-stator flux linkages to meet different design goals.

RE: Article on Brushless Motor Terminology

(OP)
Brad: Thanks for the info. I had not seen that thesis, but I have seen most of the terms. PMSM is what I see most often in the serious technical literature -- IEEE papers and the like.

However, I disagree on "trapezoidally wound" versus "sinusoidally wound". I see it more as a dichotomy instead of a continuum. I don't see any point in making a motor somewhere in between the two. That said, the waveforms for trapezoidally wound motors are further from true trapezoids than sinusoidally wound motors are from true sinusoids, and different trap motor designs have different variations from the ideal waveforms.

But the biggest issues I see in the field come from using one type of motor when the other should be used (or using an inappropriate commutation algorithm for the motor design).

RE: Article on Brushless Motor Terminology

Interesting article. . . As I remember, early “Brushless DC” motors were an attempt to remove the mechanical commutation (brushes, commutator bar, brush rigging, etc.) and replace with electronic commutation (no brushes, “Brushless DC”). With the exception of the influence of the mechanical brush rigging vs. electronic commutation, the performance (Torque vs. Speed) was equivalent to the “DC Brush” motor. Three phase induction motors were well suited to do this by using the existing three phase induction stator and replacing the squirrel cage rotor with a permanent magnet rotor an commutate the stator winding by having shaft position feedback to sequence the phases. The type of electronics (drive scheme) has somewhat influenced naming varieties for this motor (for example six step vs. sine etc.)

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources