×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

PSV functional diagrams
2

PSV functional diagrams

PSV functional diagrams

(OP)
Hi all,

I'm comparing different sources on various subjects of safety relief valves and found different diagrams showing a "typical" valve opening/closing characteristic.

Of course there is API520 (8th ed.) which provides figure 6 (page 14), the Consolidated Catalogue for Safety Relief Valves (dated Oct. 2008), the LESER handbook (http://frame.leser.com/engineering/file/EHB_en_eng...) and SpiraxSarco (http://www.spiraxsarco.com/resources/steam-enginee...) describe PSV operation. Of course there are more sources.
The curve from API, is similar to the diagram in the Consolidated catalogue, where the PRV lifts to 50%-60% right at set pressure and then continously lifts with further pressure increase. Closing is proportional to the pressure decrease, API starts closing at ~105% of set pressure, Consolidated at 98% of set. Valve reseats at the required blowdown of 93% set pressure.
In contradiction the diagrams of LESER and SpiraxSarco show proportional opening to ~104% set pressure, then (nearly) full opening at ~105% set pressure. Closing starts at 99% of set pressure and is rather parabolic then proportional, also reseating within the blowdown limit.
I assume the latter show curves for pop-action ("safety") valves, while API and Consolidated show "relief" valves? Anyhow I wonder, why API and Consolidated instantly open at virtually set pressure, while others need huddling chamber etc. to overcome spring force.

Which leads me to another question bothering me: What range is the additional force required to compress the spring to 100% disc lift? I expect the force is linear with the lift and should not exceed 105% of CDTP? Or even less?

CU, Smiler

RE: PSV functional diagrams

2
All of these curves are intended to show the generalized lift characteristice of pop valves. There's wide variation for any partuicular valve, but they follow this general trend. In words, these diagrams are all saying the same thing:

    Pop valves don't immediately open to full capacity (full lift). They pop open but not fully open. Overpressure is required in order for a pop valve to reach full lift.
    Pop valves close along a different path, different from the opening path. The pressure must decrease below the set pressure in order for the valve to close. The amount of pressure decrease below the set pressure (blowdown) will vary, depending on the fluid state, the type of valve trim, and the mechanical characteristics of the specific valve.
That is all that these diagrams are trying to illustrate, and that's all that one can take away from them. Note that these drawings don't increment the X and Y axes with specific valves.

Regarding your question about CDTP in this post and in the previous one, understand that CDTP has no relevance at all for the relief designer. CDTP is only relevant to the maintenance shop, when testing a PSV on a test stand.

RE: PSV functional diagrams

DOn, started out the same way as you, but then i took a closer look at the Leser book, and it actually shows the opposit (and claims its typical for a spring loaded valve: It opens proportinally from approx 100% SP to aprox 104% and then jumps to 100% open (and the Leser diagram is actually quite specific wrt axis.

RE: PSV functional diagrams

Morten - I see what you're talking about. Leser drew their diagram differently. Regardless, one shouldn't assume that their API 526 pop valves don't require overpressure in order to reach the full-open position. The two descriptive points I listed above apply to Leser valves too. I can't say why they chose to represent the lift curve the way they did.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources