×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

API Inspections on Expansion Bottles

API Inspections on Expansion Bottles

API Inspections on Expansion Bottles

(OP)
Hey guys,

I am currently working on a plan for required tank and pressure vessel inspections throughout the plant and I had a question for the expansion bottles. Basically, we have these 1 inch lines that connect to a rupture disc which then vents to a small carbon steel expansion bottle when ruptured.

My question is, do these small bottles fall under the jurisdiction of API 510 inspection - meaning external, internal, and on-stream inspections? API 510 seems to define these expansion bottles as out-of-service equipment as they rarely (if ever) see process fluid. In that case, the interval for inspection is based on the years of actual service. However, these expansion bottles are technically always in service, but rarely see process fluid.

Thanks in advance.

RE: API Inspections on Expansion Bottles

[puts my 510 hat on] I would be happy with thicknesses and call the Inspx an 'On-Stream in lieu of Internal' per 510 6.5.2(?). That assumes that the R/D's haven't blown, or if they have that the fluid is benign to the steel the bottles are made of. Typical use is on liquid chlorine or liquid ammonia lines, and [if dry] don't hurt plain carbon steel.

Otherwise, I'd stick a "SeeSnake" camera into the bottle(s) that have had the most R/D's blown, and UT-T the areas that looked the worst on the scope. If those bottle look good, sign off the rest based on 'Similar Service' and be done. Simple, easy, fairly fast Inspx of a simple item.

RE: API Inspections on Expansion Bottles

(OP)
@Duwe6, it is for dry liquid chlorine so it should not not be a problem. I think we will stick to UT on the bottles. I've read through 510 and it does not stipulate any requirements on hydro testing pressure vessels. Is this required or more of a suggested practice every so often?

RE: API Inspections on Expansion Bottles

Hydro is actually a poor idea. Standard practice is to never reperform the hydro, unless the vessel has been Altered in a manner that the design calc's have changed.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources