Datums and centerlines
Datums and centerlines
(OP)
My current argument with some of our older engineers is showing centerlnes as datums on their prints.I know it has been an accepted practice by some over the years even though frowned upon by some others. I have explained that under GD&T it is basically forbidden. As head of QC Mechanical I attend GD&T seminars and it has always been explained that a datum has to be something you can touch and you cannot touch a centerline.I am having this argument because I see the younger engineers are taking the lead from from their 'Mentors' and getting into this 'bad' habit. Do you think I right to press the point?





RE: Datums and centerlines
“Know the rules well, so you can break them effectively.”
-Dalai Lama XIV
RE: Datums and centerlines
Getting those definitions across to your colleagues should be enough to show why a centerline shouldn't be labeled as a datum. Other reasons: it can be ambiguous since several items can often be shown as aligned to a common centerline; and also because labeling a centerline doesn't tell anybody in the real world what to actually grab onto.
John-Paul Belanger
Certified Sr. GD&T Professional
Geometric Learning Systems
RE: Datums and centerlines
RE: Datums and centerlines
Isn't there a court case about this very issue where the symbol was on the axis not a feature and because of this the definition was ambiguous and a company ended up paying for a bunch of bad parts or some such. I seem to recall this being one of the poster child cases for drawings being a legal document etc.
What is Engineering anyway: FAQ1088-1484: In layman terms, what is "engineering"?
RE: Datums and centerlines
On the next post I want to discuss Basic Dimensions that will be later.
Thanks
RE: Datums and centerlines
John-Paul Belanger
Certified Sr. GD&T Professional
Geometric Learning Systems
RE: Datums and centerlines
To John-P on the Basic Dimension, yes that is one of the answers I get.
RE: Datums and centerlines
“Know the rules well, so you can break them effectively.”
-Dalai Lama XIV
RE: Datums and centerlines
You are correct. Concentricity requires a datum. Circularity does not. I don't think the ± means anything in an FCF.
All three concentricity tolerances, including the broach, can be replaced by positional tolerances. In the case of the broach, it should be replaced. Concentricity is not supposed to be used much anymore.
Note that while concentricity compares a round feature with another round feature, a positional tolerance requires a fully fixtured part. You need a full set of datums with your specification.
--
JHG
RE: Datums and centerlines
As an aside to your original question, terms such as "DRILL" and "BROACH" should be omitted from the drawing; per Y14.5 1.4 Fundamental Rule (e): "The drawing should define a part without specifying manufacturing methods. Thus, only the diameter of a hole is given without indicating whether it is to be drilled, reamed, punched, or made by any other operation. However, in those instances where manufacturing, processing, quality assurance, or environmental information is essential to the definition of engineering requirements, it shall be specified on the drawing or in a document referenced on the drawing."
“Know the rules well, so you can break them effectively.”
-Dalai Lama XIV
RE: Datums and centerlines
Tunalover
RE: Datums and centerlines
This drawing is pretty atrocious. Sorry but I can't think of a nicer word. It's like someone just rewrote the standard and forgot to mention it to anyone.
On Item 11, both callouts are wrong for reasons already mentioned. ewh asked a valid question. This drawing is so far removed from the reality of ASME Y14.5 that it makes me think this person is used to working to some in-house standard and doesn't realize there's a standardized way to do things like this.
John Acosta, GDTP S-0731
Engineering Technician
Inventor 2013
Mastercam X6
Smartcam 11.1
SSG, U.S. Army
Taji, Iraq OIF II
RE: Datums and centerlines
Thanks for all the feedback. Now review my post on Basic Dimensions.
RE: Datums and centerlines
Good luck!
“Know the rules well, so you can break them effectively.”
-Dalai Lama XIV
RE: Datums and centerlines
This problem goes quite far beyond simple "adherence to standards" though at the LEAST you /should/ be pressing that. If you are going to be in the position to assure the customers of the quality of your products then you have to start with the quality of standards your team performs by. Our quality manager isn't very good at inspection. He understands the standards but he doesn't really do much of any hands-on inspection. He reviews the rules, guidelines, and standards by which we operate, verifies our adherence, and calls us out when we deviate, or at least works with us to figure out why, and how to immediately solve it in a satisfactory way that he could defend to a customer. When engineering, production, inspection are not adhering to satisfactory standards, he talks to us about it, and if he isn't satisfied with the resolution of that meeting, it goes to higher management.
_________________________________________
Engineer, Precision Manufacturing Job Shop
Tool & Die, Aerospace, Defense, Medical, Agricultural, Firearms
NX8.0, Solidworks 2014, AutoCAD LT, Autocad Plant 3D 2013, Enovia DMUv5
RE: Datums and centerlines
----------------------------------------
The Help for this program was created in Windows Help format, which depends on a feature that isn't included in this version of Windows.
RE: Datums and centerlines
RE: Datums and centerlines
Why does this surprise you? I learnt nothing about GD&T (or even general good drafting practices) at school and as far as I can determine few others did either. I strongly suspect many drafting (or whatever the term is) classes these days focus on how to use a certain CAD package not fundamentally what you need to do with it to create a good drawing/MBD.
What is Engineering anyway: FAQ1088-1484: In layman terms, what is "engineering"?
RE: Datums and centerlines
I am on the executive of one of the Toronto chapters of OACETT. I am looking into setting up a GD&T clinic. I took my GD&T course at Ryerson University, in the evening, long after I graduated. The course is no longer available. The big local universities, University of Toronto and York University, both have good engineering departments, but they do not teach GD&T. Seneca College does. This is taught in the evening. An engineering technologist, graduating from Seneca with a three year diploma probably has not been taught this. I am talking to them about the clinic.
When I took my course at Ryerson, I recall that there were around six of us in the class, one of whom was a day student. This is not enough to keep them running a course.
GD&T is not being taught at colleges and universities in my area. Probably, it is not being taught in your area.
--
JHG
RE: Datums and centerlines
I like to use a similar tact when a designer/drafter I work with resists adding positional FCFs on "symmetric" parts.
Another good example our Drafting Supervisor likes to use when there is a bunch of cylindrical features nominally concentric with no GD&T is to take out the change in his pocket, stack the different coins concentrically and the conversation typically goes like:
"Image this is your part, would you accept this part?"
"Sure."
--Takes the stack of coins and taps them on the nearest flat surface so that all the ODs are flush to one side[therefore not even remotely concentric]--
"What about this one?"
"No, I'd reject it."
"Why? It meets your drawing specification."
And then there would be some argument about "implied" concentricity. It's entertaining to watch.
RE: Datums and centerlines
John Acosta, GDTP S-0731
Engineering Technician
Inventor 2013
Mastercam X6
Smartcam 11.1
SSG, U.S. Army
Taji, Iraq OIF II
RE: Datums and centerlines
Will SW 14 incorporate it into CAD like Pro/E?
- CJ
RE: Datums and centerlines
Drawing how bad is not what I am trying to talk about, perhaps nobody knows your post figure is only the shank portion of a lever, it’s very hard for all to understand the design intend and its functionality, please see this thread (5 years ago) linked below, it will help you on how to well define the DRF and the positioning parts feature in a DRF.
Well, any comments on the lever DRF callout are welcome.
Season
RE: Datums and centerlines
http://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=240138
Season
RE: Datums and centerlines
I'm not really sure about the point you are trying to make in your post but it sounds like you're trying to say that the drawing could be okay depending on the function of the part. Is that what you're saying?
John Acosta, GDTP S-0731
Engineering Technician
Inventor 2013
Mastercam X6
Smartcam 11.1
SSG, U.S. Army
Taji, Iraq OIF II
RE: Datums and centerlines
General notes and default tolerances can be super great. There is a lot of "implied" relationships but notes can give them tolerances and really keep a drawing clean.
_________________________________________
Engineer, Precision Manufacturing Job Shop
Tool & Die, Aerospace, Defense, Medical, Agricultural, Firearms
NX8.0, Solidworks 2014, AutoCAD LT, Autocad Plant 3D 2013, Enovia DMUv5
RE: Datums and centerlines
The drawing could not be okay, as I mentioned "any comments on the lever DRF callout are welcome",expect to hear your comment regarding to the DRF callout.
Season