×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

best purlines orientation

best purlines orientation

RE: best purlines orientation


My personal oppinion:

"B" is better than "A".

RE: best purlines orientation

From the standpoint of ease of erection for the guy in the field, I would prefer A over B.

Structurally, I don't think it makes much difference, other than with A, the connection to the vertical strut will be in compression rather than in tension with B. Uplift will still control the fasteners for both.

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering

RE: best purlines orientation

I would think B > A. but that is only an opinion. I suppose if you wanted to get technical the best system may be a combination, have each other one face opposite direction to reduce the torsional effects from the cross section... but the slope and its a roof not a floor makes me think i would just specify B... but i'd accept A.

RE: best purlines orientation

During erection, option A will result in less propensity to twisting due to the reduced eccentricity from the shear centre. This is called Standard Mode in Australia.

Option B is easier to clean out the bottom flange, if this is a factor.

In-service wind loads will act normal to the sheeting, so under these actions A = B.

RE: best purlines orientation

Cee sections like theses should be alternated back/back, front/front as one proceeds up the slope. These will cancel out the roll forces that develop.

RE: best purlines orientation

A is the best option.
Produces less twist because the twisting moment (vertical load times the eccentricity of shear centre) is less for position A.

RE: best purlines orientation

civeng80 is correct. Always orient then so that the gravity loading is closest to the shear centre. Better yet, use zed shaped purlins, with the top flange upslope, which also deals better with the debris accumulation issue.

RE: best purlines orientation

From a constructability point of view, A is better because it's easier to carry.

RE: best purlines orientation

Agree with civeng80. I have not run the numbers on C shapes, but it makes a huge difference on Z purlins.

RE: best purlines orientation

It's worth noting that orientation is a bigger deal with a Z-girt because, in addition to the shear centre issue, a Z-girt's principal axes are rotated at angle relative to the web. The top flange uphill orientation better aligns your maximum moments with your strong axis section properties. This doesn't come into play for C-girts. Old news for most, no doubt.

The greatest trick that bond stress ever pulled was convincing the world it didn't exist.

RE: best purlines orientation

In either case, you need sag rods tied to the ridge beam to carry the minor axis bending of the purlin.

BA

RE: best purlines orientation

A is preferred. But have seen and used both.

In reality they sometimes just end up orientated whichever way the unaware architect first drew them!

In this part of the world sag rods haven't been used for years. Purlin are always detailed with channels between which helps to deal with any twist.

RE: best purlines orientation

The channels basically serve as improved sag rods, right?

The greatest trick that bond stress ever pulled was convincing the world it didn't exist.

RE: best purlines orientation

In Australia, the purlin manufacturers have proprietary bridging systems to suit their purlins and girts.

RE: best purlines orientation

KootK,
I would disagree with your statement about orientation being a bigger deal with Z sections. It is all about eccentricity of gravity loading to shear centre. With a Z section, the shear centre is at the web, while for the C section, it is outside the web. Therefore, the C has greater eccentricity with either orientation. With the Z section oriented correctly, top flange uphill, there is no eccentricity with vertical loading.

RE: best purlines orientation

I'm holding firm on this one. Let's try this:

1) With a C-girt, there's one benefit to proper orientation: the shear centre eccentricity thing.

2) With a Z-girt, there are two benefits to proper orientation: shear centre eccentricity & better alignment between load and principal strong axis.

Whether or not the two benefits with the Z-girt weigh more or less than the one benefit on the C-section probably varies based on the situation.

From a practical member selection standpoint, I suspect that the shear centre eccentricity won't mater at all. We orient the purlins correctly because it's good practice to minimize torsion. However, I've yet to see anybody actually design their open section Z & C girts for the inevitable torsion. Taking advantage of the principal axis orientation may well yield a lighter section.

The greatest trick that bond stress ever pulled was convincing the world it didn't exist.

RE: best purlines orientation

I agree that bending and buckling in light gage sections is very complex. That is why we use load tables, which are based more on full scale testing than on calculation.

I do know that for gravity loading during construction, stepping on a Z section is more comfortable than a C of the same span and braced in the same manner.

RE: best purlines orientation

The best orientation for a purlin is straight.

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering

RE: best purlines orientation

It's a lifestyle choice.

The greatest trick that bond stress ever pulled was convincing the world it didn't exist.

RE: best purlines orientation

Mike,
That would be true for you as well, but bent you are.

RE: best purlines orientation

At KootK, yes basically do the same job at laterally restraining the section, but a much better job at torsionally restraining the section.

See attached link for a picture labelled fastbrace

Link

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources