×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Convention for tension and compression

Convention for tension and compression

Convention for tension and compression

(OP)
So I just discovered today that the guys in my office use an opposite sign convention for tensile and compressive member forces. Is it a Canadian thing or perhaps a mechanical thing to refer to tensile member forces as positive? I understand the convention is relative but I think this is the type of thing that can cause Mars landers to end up as smoking wrecks if you are not aware of it ;)


RE: Convention for tension and compression

Where a sign is required, I normally take tension as positive, but hadn't thought about that being mechanical or Canadian in nature. Where a column is loaded in compression & bending, I'll normally calculate both compression and tension as positive quantities.

In most of my applications, tension is membrane tension in a shell or something similar, and as far as I know, the positive for tension is fairly universal there. In the past, I've used some structural analysis software, but was thinking it took tension as positive for structural members also.

A couple of days ago, I was using the beam equations in the AISC green book and then also some out of Roark's Formulas for Stress and Strain. One uses positive deflection as upward, the other downward. And Roark uses tension = positive for circular rings and whatnot.

RE: Convention for tension and compression

This also depends whether you are talking about a member or a global system.

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering

RE: Convention for tension and compression

Unless I'm doing something that actually requires direct manipulation of a lot of values I generally don't use signs for tension or compression. I write a T or C after them to avoid confusion. If I do something tabulated on a computer or somewhere else where I need to use signs, I'll summarize it somewhere on the sheet.

RE: Convention for tension and compression

I'd say it was more a case of being a structural engineer thing to have tension as negative. I'm used to that convention, and often use it, but really it makes more sense to have tensile strains and stresses as positive, since they represent an increase in length.

Doug Jenkins
Interactive Design Services
http://newtonexcelbach.wordpress.com/

RE: Convention for tension and compression

Everybody in our office does it differently. It sure keeps us on our toes when we peer review calcs, though.

RE: Convention for tension and compression

I use whatever convention the software I am using uses in hand calculations, so at least the software output is consistent with my hand numbers.

Otherwise it's handy to add a T or C just to be clear as TLHS mentioned to rem9ve any ambiguity.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources