×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Alternative relief path for tube rupture - API 521 interpretation

Alternative relief path for tube rupture - API 521 interpretation

Alternative relief path for tube rupture - API 521 interpretation

(OP)
I am evaluating a tube rupture scenario in which both sides contain liquid. There is no vapor or flashing involved with the tube rupture. The tube side is the high pressure side and the maximum operating pressure of ~700 psig exceeds the low-pressure shell side hydrotest pressure of 390 psig. I am trying to reduce the relieving requirements for a relief device. API 521, Section 5.19.5 in the 5th edition (or section 4.4.14.2.4 of the 6th edition) says “…if a detailed analysis is performed, a capacity credit may be taken for acceleration of the low-pressure side liquid.” In this case, is a “detailed analysis” referring to a dynamic analysis to simulate the pressure profile as discussed in API 521 Section 5.19.3 (5th edition) or can a hydraulic analysis be performed to show the low-pressure side can accept the increased liquid flow without unacceptable pressure increases? I am curious how others interpret this and if this approached has been used, what type of analysis was performed? Thank you.

RE: Alternative relief path for tube rupture - API 521 interpretation

The meaning of "detailed analysis" in 6th ed 4.4.14.2.4 is completely different from "dynamic analysis" which is discussed in 5th ed 5.19.3 (4.4.14.2.2 in the 6th ed.). Dynamic tube rupture analysis refers to the potentially catastrophic shell failure that can occur when the tube side contains a very high pressure gas (or liquified gas) while the low-pressure shell side is liquid-filled. In such cases, a tube failure can cause the shell to "explode" due to the sudden shock force applied by the escaping tubeside fluid. Due to its inertia, the shellside liquid can't move out of the way fast enough, resulting in catastrophic shell failure.

In the application which you describe, this dynamic (or inertial) type failure isn't a risk. Your case is a simple one in which the tubeside fluid will flow out of the exchanger along with the shellside liquid. As long as that flow path is open, a tube failure won't cause overpressure.

RE: Alternative relief path for tube rupture - API 521 interpretation

(OP)
don1980,
Thank you for your response.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources