×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Cracked Section Properties for Wind/Seismic Serviceability Analysis

Cracked Section Properties for Wind/Seismic Serviceability Analysis

Cracked Section Properties for Wind/Seismic Serviceability Analysis

(OP)
The policy is my office is that we used cracked section properties per ACI for wind strength analysis, however we use the gross section properties for serviceability analysis. My question is why can this be assumed. Let say for example that you have a design wind storm in the first year of service. At this point this building is likely completely cracked but may still remain structurally adequate. Are we not then saying that for the remaining life of the structure the building will experience drifts much greater than H/400? My guess is that this is assumed based on the probability that it will occur within the service life of the building.

RE: Cracked Section Properties for Wind/Seismic Serviceability Analysis

Remember that the code assumes the structure merely avoids collapse during a design event. It may have to be repaired, reinforced, retrofitted, torn down, whatever. The goal is merely life-safety.

So, in your example the building experiences it's design event in the first year. If it didn't fall down, then it worked as planned. Anything that happens after that is a bonus.

The better question is what happens if it gets a wind event that is 50% of the design event every year for 10 years. Is it sufficiently cracked at the end of that time that the next wind event (let's say at 70% of design event force levels) causes deflections significantly greater than H/400.

If the answer is no, then your analysis using gross properties is justified. If not, then maybe using a reduced stiffness in your analysis would be a better idea.

RE: Cracked Section Properties for Wind/Seismic Serviceability Analysis

Lots of opinions on this topic and there does not seem to be a standard in the industry. Most common thing that I see is running the service load combos and checking for either net tension > 0 or net tension > fr and then cracking those regions and iterating. Check out 8.8.1 in ACI318-08, this gives some guidance for modeling under service loads.

RE: Cracked Section Properties for Wind/Seismic Serviceability Analysis

ACI 318 (08 and 11) section 8.8 provides some guidance for member stiffness when considering lateral deflection.

RE: Cracked Section Properties for Wind/Seismic Serviceability Analysis

Isn't wind design made to be elastic and therefore not supposed to have any cracking? Or are you talking hurricane level wind?

Seismic governs where I come from, so was just curious about all this wind serviceability talk.

RE: Cracked Section Properties for Wind/Seismic Serviceability Analysis

If the wind forces create effects in the members that create stresses higher than the cracking stress then the member is cracked.

It depends on the structural arrangement and magnitude of the moments and axial loads relative to the member sizes.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources