Question about metric
Question about metric
(OP)
Hi guys,
we are a company (ACE-Hellas SA) that has a software for static and dynamic analysis plus design of structures.
The question though is the following:
Currently we are looking for partners to promote our software all over the world.
Our software supports only metric and not imperial units.
I see that in US there are a lot of talks about adopting officially the metric system.
For us to support imperial units is not so easy - as we have to recreate all forms and calculations, so it will take a lot of time.
Do engineers in US work with metric or imperial units for the static and dynamic analysis?
We want to see if we should try to promote the software in the US as well.
Thanks!
we are a company (ACE-Hellas SA) that has a software for static and dynamic analysis plus design of structures.
The question though is the following:
Currently we are looking for partners to promote our software all over the world.
Our software supports only metric and not imperial units.
I see that in US there are a lot of talks about adopting officially the metric system.
For us to support imperial units is not so easy - as we have to recreate all forms and calculations, so it will take a lot of time.
Do engineers in US work with metric or imperial units for the static and dynamic analysis?
We want to see if we should try to promote the software in the US as well.
Thanks!






RE: Question about metric
Seriously? Almost any program that supports units defaults all calculations to one consistent system. They convert any other unit inputs into their internal representation and present results converted back to the user input unit convention. Mathcad is a good example of that. It supports arbitrary dimensional units for input, but internal representation is always SI. In fact Mathcad supports mixed units as well.
"Do engineers in US work with metric or imperial units for the static and dynamic analysis?"
Yes, but, if anything, they probably do most things in imperial units.
TTFN

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies
Need help writing a question or understanding a reply? forum1529: Translation Assistance for Engineers
RE: Question about metric
For us accuracy is everything.
We have done some tests internally with converting but you get to loose always with decimals conversions.
For example 2.5 meters = 98.4251969 inches, so you see it is a matter of precision mostly for us and you know that there are a lot of mathematical calculations going on till the end result.
Our software is used to calculate skyscrapers and bridges. All numbers matters when we are talking about human lives.
I perfectly understand your point but we have chosen for the above reasons not to go down this road.
We prefer to not have it, than to have wrong results, or results that won't make sense and discredit the software.
RE: Question about metric
Whether or not that's a good thing is a different question. I happen to be among the minority of my associates in my belief that the Imperial system is superior for engineering applications. That might earn me a heap of scorn but that's ok. But if this thread turn into a metric vs. imperial debate don't let it detract from the answer to the question you originally asked: the US will NOT likely switch to the metric system anytime soon so make your business decisions accordingly.
RE: Question about metric
No need for this to be a debate.
I hear you guys loud and clear :)
RE: Question about metric
Scary to read. Using Double Precision (double) should not be a problem.
Fire your programmer. Serious FEA Software should be able to use consistant unit. Your client should be able to switch Length or/and Force unit as they wish ! Ex : (kN / m or kN/mm or kip / in or kip / ft, etc...)
RE: Question about metric
it is not only the calculation part - let's say we use double and let's assume that all goes well.
Still we have to recreate all the forms to be feet/inches, so two boxes - one for feet and one for inches.
Currently there is only one for cm for example.
Except if you tell me that using only inches (so only one box) is acceptable.
Then things are easy, I agree. We just change everything from cm to inches and do internal conversion.
Truly we never looked at imperial implementations as our target market was always EU.
RE: Question about metric
-
Or am i showing my ignorance of other country's engineering?
-
As for the two inputs, many programs only accept feet, ie 4.58' is about 4'-7"
RE: Question about metric
Convert internally
8'-5" -> 8.416667 ft
8'-5 3/32" -> 8.424479 ft
RE: Question about metric
So yes AISC would still be something we would need to do after we offer imperial.
Pico - thanks for your feedback. I will forward it to the development team.
RE: Question about metric
Dik
RE: Question about metric
Moreover, the imperial to metric conversion factor is EXACTLY 1 inch = 2.54 cm, so there is no precision or accuracy loss going in. The only loss would be on the other end of the calculation, and with double precision math, it's completely negligible.
TTFN

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies
Need help writing a question or understanding a reply? forum1529: Translation Assistance for Engineers
RE: Question about metric
RE: Question about metric
There are still a large number of engineers in Canada who refuse to use the SI system, instead clinging rigorously to the Imperial system. I became intimately familiar with both systems over the years and feel comfortable working in either system but I do not like mixing the two. Better to work in one system, then convert at the end if required.
BA
RE: Question about metric
RE: Question about metric
But the parts and pieces will be bought in ANSI units, and built all-to-often by newly-arrived-unskilled poor-language labor using inches and (maybe) fractions correctly. Tools and jigs and steel and pipe and xonrete and boards are NOT metric. But they are NOT "pure ANSI" feet-inch-fraction-decimal either!
You will need specific and different pipe tables, steel tables, nut-and-bolt tables, wood size tables, and stair heights and sheet rock wall thickness and plywood sizes and rebar sizes. Plate dimensions, rail sizes, tube sizes, weld spec's, etc. Nails? Screws? Rill bit Diamters? Wheels? Bearings?
Today is NOT an easy world in construction.
RE: Question about metric
RE: Question about metric
ooo I hate those things.
Then again, at least they're not as bad as "hectopascals".
RE: Question about metric
RE: Question about metric
RE: Question about metric
TTFN

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies
Need help writing a question or understanding a reply? forum1529: Translation Assistance for Engineers
RE: Question about metric
I don't think that's the reason behind the resistance to change. Rather, I think, it's that in the US systems are in place as racookpe1978 noted.
I remember years ago I mentioned to my boss that a particular project was required to be designed in metric. His response was, "They can do that if they want but there is no one in town who would be able to build it."
That's assuming real metric design, of course. Some that I've seen have been laughable, i.e., "place 2.54 cm of non-shrink grout under base plate..."
RE: Question about metric
Dik
RE: Question about metric
TTFN

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies
Need help writing a question or understanding a reply? forum1529: Translation Assistance for Engineers
RE: Question about metric
RE: Question about metric
Its not just the right- its all politicians. A congressman (Democrat by the way) once told me that the reason we still have daylight savings time is because there are no votes to be gained by eliminating it. No politician is willing to spend political capital on something that won't benefit them in any way. Same goes for Metric conversion.
RE: Question about metric
For the early 1990's the US Federal government started mandating that the US convert...only to be pushed back by most every industry in the construction world. We were already starting to do bridge in SI for the state DOT's but they then reversed course. Nothing to do with left or right.
RE: Question about metric
To get back to your original question - you would absolutely need to handle imperial units to have success in the US market. I would also say that you shouldn't either force feet or inches, but have both options (along with lbs, kips etc.) if you are going to compete with the other software out there. Download some trial versions of the popular software used in the US (Etabs, Ram, Midas, Risa etc.) to see what they offer - all of them allow you to switch easily between units at any time.
RE: Question about metric
Even in Europe, we are not consistent in using the SI system. I have seen stresses expressed in (metric) tonne / cm squared.
RE: Question about metric
RE: Question about metric
I am in Canada. I just today walked up to the counter of a fastener and tool store and asked for a 90° countersink. They stared at me blankly and told me that countersinks are 82°.
In the USA and Canada, you need to cope with English units.
--
JHG
RE: Question about metric
there is still a lot more to do for Europe as I mentioned, so I just wanted to see if US would be a market we could target soonish.
We already discussed the feedback you guys gave and we have decided to focus in Europe/South Africa/Australia for now.
I would love though to get some feedback from guys in Europe about our software and what they think about it.
We have free version available (http://www.scadapro.eu), plus manuals and we are making more youtube videos with examples.
RE: Question about metric
Metric affects angles?
RE: Question about metric
RE: Question about metric
If that had been in one particular state, that could have been due to the legal definition of pi = 3.0
TTFN

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies
Need help writing a question or understanding a reply? forum1529: Translation Assistance for Engineers
RE: Question about metric
RE: Question about metric
Dik
RE: Question about metric
I have noticed that a few engineers in BC are still using Imperial, but I thought that most of Canada had converted to metric. Our codes are written in metric, so I don't know why people are so slow to comply.
In Alberta, all government projects must be detailed in metric. Many of the steel fabricators are detailing strictly in metric, even in projects in which the EOR details in Imperial. This is not a very good situation and has led to errors in the past.
Unfortunately, the lumber industry has not generally converted to metric. We are still using plywood and OSB which are 48"x96" which means that our studs and joists are spaced at 16" or 24" (406mm or 610mm on government projects which is a total pain in the butt). We can specify 1200 x 2400 plywood, but we pay extra for it because they take a 4' x 8' sheet of plywood and cut it down to size which means we pay for the cutting and end up with less material. It is not likely to change any time soon because the lion's share of the market is in the USA.
BA
RE: Question about metric
Maine EIT, Civil/Structural.
RE: Question about metric
Our weatherman uses centimetres to describe rainfall or snowfall. For that purpose, they are fine but they do not mix readily with metric units in the SI system which Canada has adopted. For example, 1 kiloNewton per meter is the same as 1 Newton per millimetre (1 kN/m = 1 N/mm). But 1 kN/m = 10 N/cm and there is a chance of making an order of magnitude error.
Or another example, 1 MPa (1 MegaPascal) is 1 MegaNewton per square metre which is the same as 1 Newton per square millimetre. That is, 1 MPa = 1 MN/m2 = 1 N/mm2.
Incorporating decimetres or centimetres is a recipe for disaster when carrying out engineering calculations. I came across one Mexican contractor who reported concrete strengths in kilograms per square centimetre (kg/cm2). That was a total pain to convert to usable units.
So I agree with hokie on this point. I would not want anything to do with a program which used centimetres unless it offered a conversion into more acceptable units.
BA
RE: Question about metric
Thanks for the explanation. I suppose it might be inevitable that this turn into a SI vs Imperial debate but suffice it to say you've hit on two of my annoyances with SI for structural engineering applications: (1) a slipped digit doesn't easily reveal itself and (2) people incorrectly using kilograms as a unit of "force". My third quarrel with it is that I find SI dimensions to be difficult to read quickly. For example, I've seen dimensions such as this: "60000". Quickly, is that 6 meters, 60 meters or 600 meters? I guess those who work with it regularly have no problem but discretely different units such as feet and inches are much easier to read quickly...for me.
I'm now wearing my flame-resistant suit...
RE: Question about metric
RE: Question about metric
Metric System Thriving in Nation's Inner Cities
RE: Question about metric
RE: Question about metric
TTFN

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies
Need help writing a question or understanding a reply? forum1529: Translation Assistance for Engineers
RE: Question about metric
BA has done a good job of answering your question to me (while I was asleep). I don't even like centimetres for rainfall or dressmaking, but I can't do anything about it. In structural engineering in Australia, we only use multiples of 1000, which is really what metric is about. Dimensions are all in mm. Europeans, particularly the French, use cm, but they do a disservice to the concept.
RE: Question about metric
Thanks. I know the bulk of the world uses SI so it can't be all bad.
RE: Question about metric
RE: Question about metric
RE: Question about metric
Dik
RE: Question about metric
Most English flat head screws have 82° heads. Some English flat head screws have 100° heads.
Metric flat head screws have 90° heads.
--
JHG
RE: Question about metric
On structural or architectural drawings, it is not usual to dimension anything to a precision of less than one millimetre. Where smaller dimensions are needed, micrometres or nanometres should be used, but I have never seen either used on structural drawings.
BA
RE: Question about metric
To be fair, the Eurocodes do use SI units, but even they adopt the peculiar practice of designating millistrain as 0/00, which at the moment makes no sense at all to me.
Doug Jenkins
Interactive Design Services
http://newtonexcelbach.wordpress.com/
RE: Question about metric
Do you know why they teach centimetres in school?
I've never been able to figure that out.
RE: Question about metric
No, I don't know how that started or why it can't be changed.
BA,
Do you have a reference for that? Where would you start? You mentioned 1200 x 2400 above, but don't like 60000. I see the point, but it is just the number of zeroes that is the problem? Is it 24000 or 24 000?
RE: Question about metric
To be consistent, I probably should have said 1 200mm x 2 400mm but felt there was no danger of misreading 1200mm x 2400mm as there are only two zeros involved. Similarly, 24000 is easier to read than 20000. So, yes it is really the number of zeros which causes the reader problems. The whole object is to dimension in such a way that it cannot easily be misinterpreted by the reader.
I did have a reference years ago, but have not been able to find it tonight. The comma and decimal point are discouraged because they have different meanings in different parts of the world. The folowing discussion is of some interest but is not necessarily authoritative:
http://forums.autodesk.com/t5/Drafting-Techniques/...
BA
RE: Question about metric
http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/pdf/checklist.pdf
BA
RE: Question about metric
RE: Question about metric
BA
RE: Question about metric
RE: Question about metric
My motto: Learn something new every day
Also: There's usually a good reason why everyone does it that way
RE: Question about metric
In countries like Australia, where the SI system has been in place for many years, soft conversions are uncommon. We don't have 8' or 9' ceilings, they are 2400 or 2700. And the walls are built with 70 x 35, 90 x 45, etc. studs.
RE: Question about metric
In Canada the transition to SI is anything but total, despite happening forty years ago. Sure, all the official weights and measures stuff is in metric, and people talk about km/hr and km distances rather than miles, temperatures are in degrees C, milk comes in litres etc. But we share so much across the border that we still work in all three systems- US customary, Imperial and SI/metric units. Plywood is still sold in the store by its inch dimensions even though it's made to even mm thicknesses. Pipe here is all inch NPS dimensions, and tubing in OD inch dimensions. And nobody uses metric fasteners, other than in automotive- they're still in the specialty part of the hardware store, in the tiny little bins with an enormous cost per item.
Fortunately, Bob Villa seems to have taught the Americans the virtues of the Robertson (square drive) woodscrew, but that's about all we can claim to have spread from our side of the border! In years past, I had to send a set of Robertson screwdrivers with each plant we built because as much as we tried to have "bisexual" fasteners everywhere with at least a slot to resort to in a pinch, some Robertson-only screws would sneak onto the plant somewhere and we'd have a hell of a time on site with them. Now you can find square drive screwdrivers in any Home Depot south of the border.
RE: Question about metric
Each stone is ~1-2ml, yet they went the extra distance to require precision to the hundredth of a ml.
RE: Question about metric
My motto: Learn something new every day
Also: There's usually a good reason why everyone does it that way
RE: Question about metric
no we don't. the default unit for stress is MPa everywhere i know. prehaps the british are doing it differently.
there are some other units in use sometimes, like BTU, but i am not aware how much (outside britain).