×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Wave Forces and A Seawall

Wave Forces and A Seawall

Wave Forces and A Seawall

(OP)
I have an instance where a vertical concrete wall will extend at least six feet above grade (landward side; the mudline on the seward side is about 10 feet below landward grade, thus the wall is about 16 feet high) and will be subject to direct wave impacts. The concrete wall is to be no greater than two feet thick. The return period is a 100-year storm.

The wave force, computed by the Minikin method, has a resultant of 69 kips/ft of wall. The location of the force's resultant is 14 feet above the mudline.

Constraints: the seawall is to be a vertical bulkhead-type wall with minimal excavation allowed; that is, it's not allowed to be a T-wall. NB: scour protection will be incorporated into the design.

Idea: Make it an I-wall.

Questions: OK, so it's an I-wall. What's the required section modulus of my steel that extends into the ground forming the "I"? Etc.

Other info: I am of the mind that the configuration desired is impossible. What do you folks think?

RE: Wave Forces and A Seawall

Is steel sheet piling a possibility you might consider?

Russ Faust
Salem, OR USA

RE: Wave Forces and A Seawall

(OP)
It's really a trick question... Steel sheet piling is a possibility, but the moment at the embedment point is really high; too high for a traditional I wall - unless an uneconomical embeddment depth is specified. Intuitively, a massive counterfort wall is probably the right way to go... but we're constrained such that a counterfort wall isn't allowed. The story is still unfolding...

RE: Wave Forces and A Seawall

Not sure what "uneconomical embedment" means in this case.  If greater embedment is possible and will accomplish your goal isn't that at least one possible solution ?  Yes, it may cost more than you would normally expect but does it cost more than other alternatives ?

Russ

RE: Wave Forces and A Seawall

(OP)
If you have to drive sheet piles to 70 ft and your actual wall is only 15 ft above grade and you have a couple of miles of wall, it's uneconomical.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources