Wood Building Seismic Design - who does it?
Wood Building Seismic Design - who does it?
(OP)
I'm curious who does wood building seismic design.
Also, the real reason I'm asking, is how do you do it? Do you do it by hand or with a program?
Also, the real reason I'm asking, is how do you do it? Do you do it by hand or with a program?






RE: Wood Building Seismic Design - who does it?
Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
RE: Wood Building Seismic Design - who does it?
The sooner you write your own, the longer you can use them. Mine do wind/seismic at the same time.
LonnieP
RE: Wood Building Seismic Design - who does it?
RE: Wood Building Seismic Design - who does it?
RE: Wood Building Seismic Design - who does it?
Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
RE: Wood Building Seismic Design - who does it?
RE: Wood Building Seismic Design - who does it?
This is my experience.
RE: Wood Building Seismic Design - who does it?
http://www.nceng.com.au/
"Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning."
RE: Wood Building Seismic Design - who does it?
RE: Wood Building Seismic Design - who does it?
RE: Wood Building Seismic Design - who does it?
However, I do have formatted hand fill-in sheets for both wind and seismic that I use with the equations and code references listed for the plans checker. Works for me.
Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
RE: Wood Building Seismic Design - who does it?
I think that the "who does it" question has some merit as a discussion point. I've worked for some prominent firms in the past and have never seen anyone do what I would consider to be a complete seismic design on any but the simplest light frame wood buildings. I think that this is because:
1) Light frame wood buildings are often rather complex with regard to the lateral load path.
2) The fee just isn't ever there to support the effort. Ethics would lead us to believe this is irrelevant, of course.
On the sketchy side of things, I've seen designers sum up the applied shear loads, compare then to the lengths of plywood / gypsum walls available, and call it a day. No tie downs, no explicit chords, no transfer diaphragms...
At the other end of the spectrum is the material that I've been reading in a book called "The Analysis of Irregular Shaped Structures: Diaphragms and Shear Walls". It's excellent, tedious, and all about wood lateral. It gives me hope in that the methods prescribed are very detailed and rigorous. I just truly don't know how I could ever squeeze enough fee out of a light frame wood project to make a go of it. And, even if I could, the guy down the street would probably just undercut me by $2K and buy a new boat with all of the fee he didn't spend looking into light frame wood lateral.
Yes, I'm jaded on this particular topic.
The greatest trick that bond stress ever pulled was convincing the world it didn't exist.
RE: Wood Building Seismic Design - who does it?
I love that USGS site that figures out the basics for you!
Distributing seismic forces up and down and back and forth (to the LFRS) is a pain.
RE: Wood Building Seismic Design - who does it?
RE: Wood Building Seismic Design - who does it?
Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
RE: Wood Building Seismic Design - who does it?
RE: Wood Building Seismic Design - who does it?
I generally do seismic by hand. Most of my structures are unusual and when I write a spreadsheet, it's not adaptable to other seismic problems.
I used to program all my seismic and wind calcs in Basic since that emulated my hand methods. Is Basic still around?
RE: Wood Building Seismic Design - who does it?
Wow, Buggar, that's a surprise to me. Are you saying that in Southern California wind controls most of your designs?
RE: Wood Building Seismic Design - who does it?
RE: Wood Building Seismic Design - who does it?
RE: Wood Building Seismic Design - who does it?
LonnieP
RE: Wood Building Seismic Design - who does it?
I was looking for someone else who used WoodWorks! Do you use it for the rigid diaphragm analysis or another reason, instead of just spreadsheets or hand calcs?
Tedious and rigorous do not sound appealing to me. Especially in wood design there is so much redundancy and I guess we can call it complexity with all the construction materials that it's very hard to analyze it accurately. As engineers we are able to make judgments on how to do our analysis. The simplest way is to make conservative judgments to reduce the need for tedious or rigorous analysis because we are definitely not paid enough to do it. They key word being "conservative." I've met engineers that claim collectors don't really exist, and while they are ready to back up their claim I'd rather put in a collector than spend hours proving the need for it.
RE: Wood Building Seismic Design - who does it?
I also use woodworks, but just for member design. Wood connections I have a spreadsheet for and diaphragm/shear walls I do by hand. My woodworks package is sizer, shear walls, and connections. I don't like the connection designer as it seems to be wrong in certain instances and I never noticed the shearwall designer til just now lol.
RE: Wood Building Seismic Design - who does it?