×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Pile Caps and Grade Beams - Pour Sequence

Pile Caps and Grade Beams - Pour Sequence

Pile Caps and Grade Beams - Pour Sequence

(OP)
Hi all,

I have concrete grade beams that span into the side of pile caps (top of pile caps is at the same elevation as top of grade beams).

I have designed the grade beam / pile cap system as a monolithic system. The contractor is proposing to pour the pile caps first, with bars sticking out of the pile caps that will lap with the grade beam top and bottom bars, the grade beams will be poured at a later time.

With this pour sequence, I have concerns about the shear interface between the pile caps and grade beams. I feel that the shear transfer between the grade beam and the pile cap would be compromised. Can this pour sequence be accommodated in any way? Is this an acceptable pour sequence? How would you address this?

Thanks!

RE: Pile Caps and Grade Beams - Pour Sequence

you could put a shear key in the side of the pile cap at the connections to increase shear interaction.

RE: Pile Caps and Grade Beams - Pour Sequence

GalileoG - The pour sequence the Contractor has proposed is common. It simplifies setting reinforcement steel, forming, and concrete placement. IMHO, and with all due respect, designs that rely on complex monolithic concrete shapes to succeed are a little too "theoretical". Using jayrod12's suggestion, take another look at your calculations, the constructions joints will probably be satisfactory. If not, perhaps that area should be redesigned anyway to no longer rely on monolithic construction.

www.SlideRuleEra.net idea
www.VacuumTubeEra.net r2d2

RE: Pile Caps and Grade Beams - Pour Sequence

GalileoG's concern about shear at the joint is valid. Depending on the magnitude of shear, key or dowels could be used. If the shear is always downward from the grade beams, the sides of the pile caps could be sloped. But when modifications are proposed, the contractor may decide that it not too difficult after all to cast the whole thing monolithically.

RE: Pile Caps and Grade Beams - Pour Sequence

You'll need enough reinforcing crossing your pour joint to make shear friction work there. You can count any rebar that already crosses the joint for your flexural design so, in the end, you likely won't have to do much more than appropriately roughen the interface (shear keys, bush hammering, etc.).

I find it helpful to remember that shear friction needs to be satisfied at all locations, even when monolithic construction is employed. The only difference is that, with monolithic construction, your coefficient of friction is high enough to preclude an interface shear failure the vast majority of the time. As Slide Rule has suggested, if a design only works with monolithic construction, it might be worth revisiting the design.

The greatest trick that bond stress ever pulled was convincing the world it didn't exist.

RE: Pile Caps and Grade Beams - Pour Sequence

KootK

Where do you get the idea that "shear friction needs to be satisfied at all locations..."?

RE: Pile Caps and Grade Beams - Pour Sequence

Hokie,

For better or worse, I got the idea from my own reasoning. And it has proven to be a controversial opinion, as you can imagine. I've been meaning to create a post of my own on the issue. Hopefully you'll weigh in on that post when the time comes.

I sympathise with the OP. Whenever I find out about a new cold joint in something that I imagined would be monolithic, terror grips me, my heart rate increases, and my breathing gets shallow. I imagine that a new failure plane has been created. Then, I remind myself that there was always a non-critical shear friction plane at the location of interest and that all that has changed is that the coefficient of friction on that plane has been reduced a bit from its monolithic value. I was hoping to give the OP some peace of mind by sharing my take on it.

KootK

The greatest trick that bond stress ever pulled was convincing the world it didn't exist.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources