×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

level lateral load and seismic base shear

level lateral load and seismic base shear

level lateral load and seismic base shear

(OP)
I need some advice and clarification. I am working on a large concrete box, rectangular in plan, with a rigid diaphragm roof and precast walls. There is a small office mezzanine, bearing in a corner on exterior walls for 24' in each direction. There are interior columns supporting a ridge beam.

I have calculated seismic base shear using the dead weight of the full wall heights, the entire roof, the entire mezzanine, and equipment dead loads on the roof and mezzanine. I reported a single number, i.e. I did not split it into orthogonal components.

When calculating lateral forces using IBC eqn 16-42 (2006 ed), it appears that I should only use the tributary area of the orthogonal walls to the roof diaphragm to calculate level (roof in this case) loads. Because the building is rectangular, two different loads will be generated. I'm fine with that, but my concern is that the sum of the two numbers will not equal the base shear because I'm only using half of the wall height in each case.

Am I trying to compare apples and oranges here, or am I missing something else? Should I have not considered weight supported by columns in my base shear calculation?

Thanks in advance.

RE: level lateral load and seismic base shear

Some methods do not include the wall self weights for the walls that are acting in-plane as the diaphragm doesn't see these loads. Therefore, as you have indicated you very well could have different diaphragm loading in each direction.

When it comes to checking the foundation system, you need capture back the in-plane wall self weight when checking overturning. I usually just add back in the wall self-weight times the base shear coefficient and then use half the height for the CG.

When checking mass, you only need to capture half of the column weight, as the lower half dumps it's lateral load into the foundation and base plate for that column.. the upper support of the column delivers half of the column mass to that diaphragm.



RE: level lateral load and seismic base shear

In-plane wall shear stress and in-plane jamb steel design will also need to have the wall self-weight times base shear added if you're not including the walls in plane for your base shear in that direction, similarly as I described for check of the foundation.



Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources