×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Sizing an I-Beam That's Resting On The Ground

Sizing an I-Beam That's Resting On The Ground

Sizing an I-Beam That's Resting On The Ground

(OP)
All,

I'm a mechanical engineer at a steel mill and today I was asked to design a rack which will hold steel coils (see the attached picture). The coil rack shown in the picture is in use at a sister mill whose coils weigh only 50,000 lbs whereas our coils weigh up to 90,000 lbs. As you can see, the beams are resting on the ground. I'm at a loss as to how to calculate the required beam size to support these coils. We have various sizes of W 14 on-site and would like to see if any of those sizes would suffice. The project originator would like to use a beam that would not require web stiffeners or "boxing in the beam" which would consist of a plate welded to on both sides of the beam flange. With that being said, do you guys have any advice for calculating the required beam section? I'm most worried about the beam's web failing. Keep in mind that the weight of the coil will be shared over two I-beams, just as the attached picture shows.


Stuff you may want to know:
1. The beam's bottom flange rests completely on the ground.
2. The beams will be tied together at both ends.
3. There will not be chocks in place between the coils, this allows us to use free rack space most efficiently.
4. There will not be a compressible "padding" on the top surface of the beam i.e. no wood or rubber.
5. The overall length of the rack will be 30 ft.
6. There will be 42" in the clear between the two parallel beam's flange edges.

RE: Sizing an I-Beam That's Resting On The Ground

The reference you require is the AISC Steel Construction Manual (14th Edition is current). The loading scenario you have is a continuous beam with a uniform load (the ground) and a finite number of supports (the coils). This is upside-down from your case, but you will find tables for the orientation I present. A helpful reference for determining the moments and shears of the continuous beams is Moments, Shears, and Reactions for Continuous Highway Bridges published by AISC.

RE: Sizing an I-Beam That's Resting On The Ground

Side loading of the beams may also be of issue. If the ground is not flat the beams will just fold over sideways as they have no apparent cross bracing short of the I-beam itself. This can be modeled by computing the loading at an angle.

RE: Sizing an I-Beam That's Resting On The Ground

beams on elastic foundations is a good search topic












RE: Sizing an I-Beam That's Resting On The Ground

The side loading mentioned above happens because the very heavy coil appears to be supported only at both ends, thus there is a moment arm from the weight of the middle of the coil trying to bend each I beam (probably W14) and "kick-out" the WT's away from each other.

Do this: Use 3x WF 14, not 2. The moment arm rolling the two end beams is reduced to 1/4 it previous value, and the load trying to buckle each web of the WF14's is reduced to 66% its previous value. Your problem is simplified.

RE: Sizing an I-Beam That's Resting On The Ground

Take a slice of beam a unit long, treat it as a little column fixed at the base, design the web accordingly; use appropriate K-factor for a top end that is free to sway sideways and rotate.
You could treat the ground as elastic; you could use uniform load distribution on the ground. With the elastic foundation, the reaction directly under a point load would be higher, which should reduce the moment in the beam. So assuming uniform loading on the soil side should be conservative. And you likely don't have elastic stiffness for the soil side anyway.

RE: Sizing an I-Beam That's Resting On The Ground

FWIW, it seems to me your loading case is not too dissimilar from a railway (minus the dynamics & high number of cycles), if that helps at all.

"Schiefgehen will, was schiefgehen kann" - das Murphygesetz

RE: Sizing an I-Beam That's Resting On The Ground

As per my view based on bearing pressure limit of floor/surface on which beam resting, you have to workout the length up-to which applied load transferred to floor safely. Based on this UDL and worked out length you can work out bending moment on beam. Then by use of BM and sec-modulus you can work out induced stress in beam. This situation reverse of a beam having one support and uniform load applied for certain length of beam. Good luck !

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources