×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Existing Building Drift for New Expansion Joint

Existing Building Drift for New Expansion Joint

Existing Building Drift for New Expansion Joint

(OP)
Designing a building addition in New York State. The addition will be structurally separate. The existing 2 story building does not have any obvious lateral resistance shown in existing drawings. Only thought is the exterior masonry walls help provide lateral resistance. How do I approximate a building drift to calculate the required expansion joint size?

RE: Existing Building Drift for New Expansion Joint

Are there any significant signs of drift/deflection cracking? if the structure is old and has seen near design wind and EQ loads and does not show cracking/movement than it would be fair to assume a deflection limit of the material (L/600 style). So take that as the maximum of existing and your new drift and add them together (1" for old & 0.75" new = 1.75" of expected movement) then add a nice factor for safety, say .75% of old and .33% of new... use your judgment.

Or you can push test it! stiffness is equal to force / deflection

RE: Existing Building Drift for New Expansion Joint

Great question. I've often wondered the same thing. From what I've seen, people handle this one of two ways:

1) Attempt to calculate the drift of the adjacent building. I almost never see this done in any rigorous fashion as folks rarely have the fee for it.
2) Assume that the existing building was designed to meet the drift limitations of its day. As always, assumptions can be dangerous.

While it's reasonable to assume that an older building may have already seen its design wind force, that will rarely be the case for seismic loads. The vast majority of buildings will be utterly untested seismically.

The greatest trick that bond stress ever pulled was convincing the world it didn't exist.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources