Nozzle load verification through resultant
Nozzle load verification through resultant
(OP)
Is it possible to accept calculated resultant Force and resultant moment compare with allowable resultant force and resultant moment and neglect the individual force and moment component even they are higher than allowable individual force and moment component.
This is the case for cracking and treating reactor nozzle load.
Please let me know is this correct approach or not?
thanks
This is the case for cracking and treating reactor nozzle load.
Please let me know is this correct approach or not?
thanks





RE: Nozzle load verification through resultant
I hate Windowz 8!!!!
RE: Nozzle load verification through resultant
RE: Nozzle load verification through resultant
I hate Windowz 8!!!!
RE: Nozzle load verification through resultant
This whole concept of allowable loads is, in my opinion, bunk. There are an infinite number of permutations and combinations of the 6 forces and moments that would result in Protection Against Plastic Collapse being just met. And, don't get me started on the so-called secondary stresses, which really relate to Protection Against Ratcheting - these must be based on operating load ranges, not singular design loads.