×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Reading an optical flat correctly

Reading an optical flat correctly

Reading an optical flat correctly

(OP)
So I have three optical flats of 1/20, 1/10 wave and 1/4 wave accuracy.

The surface test piece (A) that is being measure is flatter than 1/4 wave. Let's assume it has accuracy of ~1/8 wave.

So from my understanding, the 1/4 wave optics should show all flat parallel lines when places above the (A) piece under monochromatic sodium light. All this means is that the test piece (A) is as flat or flatter than 1/4 wave.

My question is, how would the 1/8 wave flat piece appear under 1/20 wave and 1/10 wave optics?

I assume it would appear more curvy (fringes) under 1/20 and less fringes under 1/10.

Since one light band wave under sodium light is 0.00029 mm or 0.0000116 inches and two fringes equals 1 light band;

Therefore, I would assume I would see few fringes under 1/10 optics and even more fringes under 1/20 wave?

Without actually knowing the test piece (A) was 1/5 wave flat, how would I estimate the flatness of the test piece (A)? By counting the number of fringes and figure out its ratio to the 1/10 and 1/20 optics?

RE: Reading an optical flat correctly

(OP)
Correction for last sentence, it should read "Without knowing the test piece (A) was 1/8 wave flat..."

RE: Reading an optical flat correctly

Go to this link at Edmunds Optics for a basic education on optical flats: http://www.edmundoptics.com/technical-support/tech...

Basically, you are measuring the thickness of the gap between your reference flat and your test surface. The potential exists for the measurement to be the sum of the two flatnesses. Your flatness with a quarter wave reference may appear worse on your test surface than it is. I suggest you use the rule of ten in your measurement methodology where your "instrument" should be at least ten times more precise than the tolerance of the feature you are trying to measure.

Bruce
http://accuratus.com

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources