×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Sine sweep vs. random vibration test

Sine sweep vs. random vibration test

Sine sweep vs. random vibration test

(OP)
We are discussing with a customer the usefulness of a Sine sweep test as an addition to a Random Vibration test. The customer is intending to set an acceptance criteria of some value for unwanted amplification on the resonances. I can see the usefulnes of a sine sweep test as a check for a pre- and post-random vibration test, but I would think that any execcesive amplifications would lead to failure in the random vibration test. Is it really unwanted amplifications if the random vibration test passes without failures???

What do you think??

RE: Sine sweep vs. random vibration test

The answer depends on several factors.

What is the purpose of the test?  
Three possiblities are:
1. Simulated expected field environment
2. Expose latent workmanship defects, part flaws, bad solder joints, etc.
3. Verify design integrity
4. Identify natural frequencies and damping ratios.

What is the expected field environment for the test item?  Is this environment best represtented by sine or random vibration?

Note that random vibration has proven to be a more effective screen of workmanship than sine vibration.  This is documented in NAVMAT P-9492.

Tom Irvine
http://www.vibrationdata.com

RE: Sine sweep vs. random vibration test

(OP)
The random vibration test is supposed to simulate the expected environment. The sine sweep test is only a 1G sweep through 0-500 Hz. As I explained, this 1g sine sweep will be done before and after the random vibration test. So natural frequencies and damping ratios will be recorded. But will a requirement for a max. amplification for the sine sweep do me any good if the random vibration test pass without malfunctions or failures?

RE: Sine sweep vs. random vibration test

I do not see a compelling reason for an amplification criteria, as long as the unit functions before, during, and after the random vibration test.

Measurement of the amplification factor should be for reference only.

Tom Irvine
http://www.vibrationdata.com

RE: Sine sweep vs. random vibration test

The primary reason for running sine sweep is to find resonances.  It may well be that the environment that the equipment is going into is characterized by a particular frequency vibration as opposed to a random vibration.  

Some of the systems that we buy are required to have no resonance greater than 10% of total mass to ensure that our stabilization system does not freak out.

TTFN

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources