×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

nailed it! great article! this happens most to engineers...
4

nailed it! great article! this happens most to engineers...

RE: nailed it! great article! this happens most to engineers...

SPOT ON. I try so hard to work with the best and better team players... Drives me crazy to have to pour time into a dud.

RE: nailed it! great article! this happens most to engineers...

Really good article. I had one supervisor in a long career who got it. He went one step farther. His feeling was that if his high-performers were thinking about their pay then they weren't thinking about their projects. He made sure that we stayed just enough ahead of the curve to be kind of grateful (e.g., the average raise in the annual cycle might be 2%, max 4% and he'd find a way to give his high performers 6% and his low performers 0.5%). It really felt good when he did that year after year. He also checked to see if we had the resources we needed on our projects (to facilitate success instead of micromanaging). Great guy. In my experience one of a kind. Whenever I had employees I tried to emulate him and it was really hard to do, and I'm certain I didn't do it nearly as well as he did.

David Simpson, PE
MuleShoe Engineering

Law is the common force organized to act as an obstacle of injustice Frédéric Bastiat

RE: nailed it! great article! this happens most to engineers...

I also agree with the article, having experienced it myself on more than one occasion in my nearly 48 year professional career. That being said, what can really be done about it?

I've been a manager, and I had a range of competencies in my group and had to deal with both high and low performers. And I was glad that the self-starters were able to do their jobs with little or no direct supervision. But I also recognized that not everyone could be left to themselves to succeed or fail. The article never touched on this, but I suspect that in many situations, the so-called "underperformers" are often new hires or people with less experience than their co-workers and therefore it's only reasonable that managers and supervisors will have to spend more time with them as they develop and gain the skills necessary to become an “A” player. That's just reality. Now don't get me wrong, I know that there may always be chronic "underperformers" in any large organization, that's just the rule of large numbers, but to assume that this can be somehow 'solved' is a bit naive at best. It's just the way thing are but as a manager, and again I was given this 'opportunity' once, if there ever is a need to let someone go, for whatever reason, if you're the person responsible for making that call, then use this to mitigate YOUR situation.

John R. Baker, P.E.
Product 'Evangelist'
Product Engineering Software
Siemens PLM Software Inc.
Industry Sector
Cypress, CA
Siemens PLM:
UG/NX Museum:

To an Engineer, the glass is twice as big as it needs to be.

RE: nailed it! great article! this happens most to engineers...

Good article.
I think if the high performers had better presentation skills they may be more recognized fr their above average achievements.


"Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication." L. da Vinci
- Gian

RE: nailed it! great article! this happens most to engineers...

FeX32....nope...then they'd be in management

RE: nailed it! great article! this happens most to engineers...

ahh true! At least they will be better compensated there wink


"Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication." L. da Vinci
- Gian

RE: nailed it! great article! this happens most to engineers...

I think we have all experienced this to some extent.

The problem I see in this article, and in other articles just like this article, is that it is premised on the notion that there are low-performers or non-performers in every company. That is simply not true. That would be tantamount to saying - analagously or metaphorically - that the second or third liners who go to the NBA all star game or the Pro Bowl are comparative non-performers relative to the starters. What I have seen is that there are bar-setters in every place I have worked, and often the bar is set high enough that it becomes an unrealistic expectation that everyone can clear it. The people who can't aren't bad people, they're just "in tough".

I train agility dogs in my spare time. When I see an otherwise great dog struggle at, say, a 26" jump height, when I know that it has the potential to be effective at that height, then like every other reasonable trainer out there, I lower the jumps to 22" or 16" for a while until both the execution and more importantly the confidence is restored in the dog. I reward the performance of the less difficult objective and build back up to the more difficult one. That is what trainers do.

In a sense, I suppose that is what this article says, along with - also analogously - sometimes even the best dog is going to knock bars and garner course faults. It happens. What concerns me is the subconscious propensity that we all have to label those with less talent or less drive or both as "non-performers". I find it healthy to remember that, at some point, we all were good enough to get an engineering degree and - more to the point - get hired as an engineer. Some measure of talent is there in all of us. It just takes a good trainer to find it and cultivate it.

RE: nailed it! great article! this happens most to engineers...

The above stated, in retrospect, it was only the first two paragraphs in the article that soured me a bit.

The rest of it, regarding how the best people always end up with the crappiest assignments on jobs already messed up by others, is probably true enough to be the norm rather than the exception. I have spent the last two decades of my career trying to escape from being sucked into that vortex, but for me, it appears that there is no escape, and never will be.

I recently made some strategic career moves in an effort to escape from just being "the mechanical guy who can do everything including run projects". I have always hated being that guy. It has meant, for me, that I get the sh*t that nobody else wants to do, or that I end up being "the goalie", the last guy who needs to save the game because there is no other avenue to turn to for assistance. The trouble is, by the time they put me in the game, there are five minutes left to play and the team is already down 6-0. We might end up only losing 7-5, but I get credit for the loss. I dont lose many games that I start...

I left Project Engineering because I was sick and tired of taking the cr*p from the Client. I moved into a pure mechanical engineering role (up to and including department lead) so I could focus on the technical aspects of the work. But no matter what I did, my employer(s) would not allow me to develop beyond what I was, and I always got called into that dreaded meeting with management, the one where they would say, "We need you to step in and take over because...nobody else comes to mind..." and Presto! There I was, running another half-finished, mostly messed-up project. A couple of moves later, I said to heck with this "mechanical engineering" nonsense; I'll join the Process group - with the full endorsement of all concerned. Well, at least it *was* - until it came to pass that a project got into trouble. This time, I had to step in and replace all of the Project Engineer, the Mechanical Engineer and lead the Process Engineering effort. I finally out and out resigned when then people involved for whom I was now placed in charge over told *me* that *I* needed to become a team player and "do a better job". The company management sat idly by and did nothing while I worked all my weekends and nights redrawing all the P&IDs and reworking the entire process from front to back, coming in on Mondays to lead all the meetings and HAZOP and face the music from a now disgruntled Client over the cost over-runs that I inherited. So, one meeting, I had enough; after 14 years, I got up from a conference room table, declared that I had had enough, typed a two line resignation and was out of the building for good inside of four minutes. This all happened less than a year after I had been formally recognized as the best employee in the company.

Human Resources took the official stance that *I* was the problem, and that the company was well-rid of me.

Fast forward to today - a little over a year later. Now a Senior Manager in a small firm. One would think I have finally clawed my way out of that cess-filled vortex. So, I have spent the first two months trying to gain - earn - the respect of those good and talented people in my charge, largely by helping them out with their day to day work and getting into the trenches with them when required. Along comes a Client who - wrongly - has an issue with one of our employees. I write one simple email memo backing up a design decision and - guess what? The Client wants our employee - an excellent employee and engineer - out and me in as the Project Engineer to finish the job. And there you have it - one award, one large performance bonus, two promotions and two companies later, and I am now sucked right back down to where I was, and where I have always been, and where I feel I am condemned to always remain: running or finishing projects.

Apparently, *that* is my reward.

My career is in a dreadful, out of control, spiraling tailspin and no amount of "performance" at my end has helped me to date.

So yes, as the article states, it takes its toll. It has pretty much destroyed me, or so it feels at this moment in time.

But I do know how to train a dog.

RE: nailed it! great article! this happens most to engineers...

To me, it's generally a battle between a highly-compensated, experienced, engineer vs. using a lower-compensated, junior engineer. That's a business decision, and often, that's how you make ends meet, by bidding senior engineers and then using junior engineers, unless they run into problems.

While there's obviously desires on the part of senior engineers to just do the work correctly from the get-go, that's a personal selfish attitude that only benefits the senior engineer until they retire. But what happens after they retire, or leave; isn't the company now burdened with junior engineers that have no experience, and no senior engineers to help things out? As employees, it's easy to gripe about our own self-interests, but we do get paid well to also serve the interests of the company, and these must be balanced against our own interests. Most of the time, they all align, and the choices are easy. But for a company to be successful and grow in the long term, the number of experienced engineers must increase over time, which means that junior engineers must be given the hard tasks to train them or break them. By "break, I simply mean that not every person that graduates with an engineering degree is necessarily cut out to do certain things, but the sooner the company can identify them and place them in an optimum position for both them and the company, the better things are going to be all around.

TTFN
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

Need help writing a question or understanding a reply? forum1529: Translation Assistance for Engineers

RE: nailed it! great article! this happens most to engineers...

Most managers spend 80% of their time with those who only do 20% of the work while the top talent quietly does 80% of the workload with minimal fuss. It is easy to get distracted by the high maintenance of underperformers and the requisite babysitting, investigating, cajoling, and documentation they require. - from the article.

A couple of times in my career, the high maintenance underperformers who required babysitting, investigating, cajoling and extra documentation were the managers I worked under! Unfortunately, the one skill they did have was presentation, so the management above them remained clueless to the extent of the problem, and could never figure out why there was a continuous turn-over of engineers in the department.

RE: nailed it! great article! this happens most to engineers...

Finally an article which addresses how lonely it is for those of us who are perfect.

RE: nailed it! great article! this happens most to engineers...

15% do more than is asked of them.
70% do just enough to keep their job
and 15% do nothing, they actually harm the company by their presence alone.

Find the top 15% in your company and do everything to keep them.
Find the low 15% and fire them immediately, production will increase just by getting rid of them - without replacing them.

RE: nailed it! great article! this happens most to engineers...

I never saw myself as a high performer. But half of the marks fit, and the one with work-life balance does not beause I wath this point very closely. I'm still not sure if this tells me anything.

Maybe the lack of targeted development is part of a strategy of some managers - you have someone in a place where he/she is highly useful, don't let them move someplace else?

RE: nailed it! great article! this happens most to engineers...

Here's a favorite Dilbert on the subject:

http://search.dilbert.com/search?w=to+base+salarie...

cry22: you've described the matrix of employees. On one axis you have smart and stupid, and on the other, hard-working and lazy. Smart and hardworking is of course what you want- they might generate 10x their salary in profit. Smart and lazy is OK too- they may generate only 3x but they're still making you money. Lazy and stupid is tolerable, or at least not an urgent problem- they only cost you 1x salary. But hard-working and stupid can take the whole company down- they need to be found and removed immediately.

Key failures of management include tolerating incompetence merely to avoid the unpleasantness of firing someone, and paying based on something arbitrary like age or years of service rather than performance. Tolerating incompetence sends a very clear message to the high performers, as does pay non-commensurate with performance. What you do for the top performers themselves is one thing, but what you do with the lower performers matters a great deal to the high performers as well.

RE: nailed it! great article! this happens most to engineers...

Don't discount the 'Smart and Lazy' too quickly as they are often the type who are willing to try something new, if it looks like it will be easier to do or avoid a lot of 'scut work'. Sometime the 'Smart and Hardworking', while they are very competent and able to really do a good job using current procedures, sometimes miss new approaches or even discount them as being not needed, at least by themselves, and could therefore miss an opportunity to become even more productive. Something that often the naturally 'Lazy' will see and take advantage of if for no other reason than that it looks easier and less tedious.

John R. Baker, P.E.
Product 'Evangelist'
Product Engineering Software
Siemens PLM Software Inc.
Industry Sector
Cypress, CA
Siemens PLM:
UG/NX Museum:

To an Engineer, the glass is twice as big as it needs to be.

RE: nailed it! great article! this happens most to engineers...

I'm probably in the smart and lazy category. I had a morning meeting Friday where I got to peer at stuff outside my assigned area. Looks like my suggestions from that one meeting are going to save upwards of $10,000,000 on that project at the cost of maybe 50 man-hours (not MY time, but someone's time) of up-front work - and the suggestions can be applied to other projects in the future.

RE: nailed it! great article! this happens most to engineers...

mOST OF THE TIME I GET THE o-@#$% jobs, the ones where my boss opens up the project book, says O-@#$%. The next thing he says is my name. My office is along side of his. However I did manage to skip the last O-@#$% job, someone else go that one.

RE: nailed it! great article! this happens most to engineers...

Touchee - smart and lazy can be a great source of innovation. Big difference between lazy and disengaged.

RE: nailed it! great article! this happens most to engineers...

There is a good Heinlein short story on the topic: "The Man Who Was Too Lazy to Fail"

RE: nailed it! great article! this happens most to engineers...

It would take a lot of convincing to get me to buy into the notion that "laziness" is ever positive in any situation, other than during a well-deserved vacation.

RE: nailed it! great article! this happens most to engineers...

I agree with SNORGY. I have never seen lazy benefit anyone.
In fact, when doing my doctorate in grad school I had a colleague who was also in grad school. He was (and still is) a very intelligent person. However, I have seen him fall well short in many areas due to laziness. As a result, much of his progress was hindered.


"Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication." L. da Vinci
- Gian

RE: nailed it! great article! this happens most to engineers...

Not to mention at the same time this laziness hindered the progress of innovation..


"Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication." L. da Vinci
- Gian

RE: nailed it! great article! this happens most to engineers...

I have been at both ends of this spectrum.
Underperform is just inexperience and no one is their to check progress, so the project just runs into the ditch. This is mainly a manager who just thinks that the underperformer should be given a sink or swin experience.

Over acheiving is after above with some years doing it right and trying to better communicate with other disiplines around you. I have been told the saying, i dont have to watch you at all. But this also gets you in trouble because you get in the bad habit of not telling managers if a project is not on target, you just deal with it.

RE: nailed it! great article! this happens most to engineers...

But don't 49% of all employees perform below average in any company?

RE: nailed it! great article! this happens most to engineers...

Yeah, but 10% of white-collar workers do 80% of the creative work.

David Simpson, PE
MuleShoe Engineering

Law is the common force organized to act as an obstacle of injustice Frédéric Bastiat

RE: nailed it! great article! this happens most to engineers...

I think performing a quick mental cost/benefit analysis of an activity and deciding not to do it, or do it differently, (Type I Lazy) shouldn't be confused with avoiding work (type II Lazy). Even if it ends up with the same result, in my opinion, there is a fundamental difference in the motivation and reasoning, "this is not efficient/of benefit" vs "I don't feel like doing this". Same result sometimes, but eventually the type II Lazy will show with cut corners and mistakes. (Equally bad is the type 1 with bad judgement I guess).

RE: nailed it! great article! this happens most to engineers...

"this is not efficient/of benefit" ... this is not what we call lazy. Sorry Keith.
I believe this is a great trait to have.


"Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication." L. da Vinci
- Gian

RE: nailed it! great article! this happens most to engineers...

I always thought it was the conservation of energy?

"Art without engineering is dreaming; Engineering without art is calculating."

Have you read FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies to make the best use of these Forums?

RE: nailed it! great article! this happens most to engineers...

Well, I'll have to amend my earlier statement, as I would be Type I Lazy.

RE: nailed it! great article! this happens most to engineers...

My grandfather used to use the term 'lazy man's load' to refer to someone carrying the most they possibly can on each trip so that they minimize the number of trips they have to make.

It all depends on what you mean by 'lazy', obviously.

RE: nailed it! great article! this happens most to engineers...

I love it- Type 1 vs Type 2 lazy! What is certain to me is that the elimination of drudgery by means of innovation is a key engineering skill. People who are OK with drudgery don't have the motivation to think about how to eliminate it.

My dad would walk everywhere, at a great clip, and did so until he was in his early '90s. When I asked him why he didn't get a bicycle for the longer trips he made routinely as a young man, he said that riding a bike to him was "walking like hell to give your @ss a ride"...So people may vary greatly in their opinion of what is drudgery and what isn't!

RE: nailed it! great article! this happens most to engineers...

I have two words to ride a bike instead of lots of walking "Plantar Fasciitis".
Dang, that hurts.

RE: nailed it! great article! this happens most to engineers...

This quote has been attributed to Ross Perot, but I can't verify whether that's accurate or not:

"Never stand when you can sit. Never walk when you can ride."

John R. Baker, P.E.
Product 'Evangelist'
Product Engineering Software
Siemens PLM Software Inc.
Industry Sector
Cypress, CA
Siemens PLM:
UG/NX Museum:

To an Engineer, the glass is twice as big as it needs to be.

RE: nailed it! great article! this happens most to engineers...

JohnRBaker,

That's not lazy. That's intelligence.

RE: nailed it! great article! this happens most to engineers...

I think the quote is fom Satchell Page. Never run when you can walk. Never stand when you can sit.

RE: nailed it! great article! this happens most to engineers...

One of my all-time favorite quotes:

"Only very lazy men could have done so much in so short a time."

John Steinbeck in Sweet Thursday.

RE: nailed it! great article! this happens most to engineers...

Meh, I don't know about about a great article.

Kind of careens between not remotely matching my experience and just being outright fantasy.

Then again, I'm crabby as hell having just had a project condensed from what was originally meant to be a 6-8 month project into an 8-9 week project plus significant added scope.

Maybe this means I'm the high performer that gets the $hit.

Posting guidelines FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm? (probably not aimed specifically at you)
What is Engineering anyway: FAQ1088-1484: In layman terms, what is "engineering"?

RE: nailed it! great article! this happens most to engineers...

The article seems to have been written by someone that wanted to become a manager more than they wanted to be an engineer. And once becoming a manager, they are sniveling about having to babysit other engineers that are more concerned about becoming managers themselves than they are about being productive engineers.

I've spent over 25 years working as an engineer for aerospace companies. And one thing I've noted during that time is that the best engineers are generally less likely to become managers.

RE: nailed it! great article! this happens most to engineers...

Well, 28 years ago a management job opened-up that I really wanted and before I could even ask about it, I was recruited for the position, and since they came to me, it was on MY terms. 17 months later, after I had accomplished the primary task that I had been asked to take care of, another job was offered to me, only this one was a move from Sales to R&D and by then I had my fill of management and sales. Granted, I really felt good about getting done what was asked and I had a good team, just that after the dust settled, it looked like to was going to be a lot less exciting. Again, since I was recruited I was again in a strong negotiating position which helped me make the decision. And I've never looked back. Note that these job changes were within the same company, just moving from a regional technical managers job in sales to a staff position in R&D. The only real hassle was that I had to relocate my family twice in 17 months, first from SoCal to Detroit and then back to SoCal. But I was working for McDonnell Douglas at the time and back in those days, being relocated by a big aerospace company had its perks. Like helping you buy and sell your houses and we hit the markets just right on both ends of the deal. It allowed for us to buy a much better house on our move back to SoCal than we could have ever afforded on our own. And since I was moving into a senior technical position, it was still technically a promotion with an appropriate bump in base salary. Granted, I lost my sales comp-plan but I liked the idea of not having to depend on my sales director making his number so that I could get that portion of my compensation which was based on sales performance. After living with that sort of deal for nearly 6 years, being paid a regular professional level salary again was a lot easier on my home life winky smile

John R. Baker, P.E.
Product 'Evangelist'
Product Engineering Software
Siemens PLM Software Inc.
Industry Sector
Cypress, CA
Siemens PLM:
UG/NX Museum:

To an Engineer, the glass is twice as big as it needs to be.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources