×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

How can this part be manufactured?
10

How can this part be manufactured?

How can this part be manufactured?

(OP)
Hi There,

I'm looking at getting this part manufactured out of copper which has internal cooling chambers. It needs to be made from 1 piece and needs to be water tight. Does anyone know of a process that can produce this?

Approximate dimensions are 500mm x 60mm x 25mm

Ideally I would like to cast it but the only process I've come up with so far be a sintering process such as sls.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Cheers,
Roy.

RE: How can this part be manufactured?

Look at investment (lost wax) casting.

It is a capital mistake to theorise before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts. (Sherlock Holmes - A Scandal in Bohemia.)

RE: How can this part be manufactured?

(OP)
I thought about investment casting but I thought you would struggle with the cavity. Do you know any examples of investment casting with cavities?

RE: How can this part be manufactured?

With lost wax -how would you get the plaster or sand out of the internal tube?

It's a big deal on engine blocks, where the hollow features are much larger and less intricate than you are proposing.

Cheers

Greg Locock


New here? Try reading these, they might help FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm?

RE: How can this part be manufactured?

2
You could investment cast the part using a soluble core. It won't be cheap, but it can be done. The internal passages are created by first creating a core from a soluble wax material, over-casting the core with a wax material that is not soluble to form the rest of the part exterior, dissolving the soluble core from the wax pattern using a suitable solvent, slurry coating the wax pattern, and finally melting the wax pattern from the investment mold.

The most difficult part of the process would be removing the investment material from inside the cored passages. This is typically done using water jet.

A more practical approach would be to machine the part in two halves, and then diffusion bond them together. For a copper heat exchanger, machining and diffusion bonding would allow greater precision in the passages and wall thicknesses. Which would result in a more efficient heat exchanger.

Good luck.
Terry

RE: How can this part be manufactured?

Quote:

It needs to be made from 1 piece

Why? So-o-o-o-o-o much easier & less expensive if you make it an assembly.

TygerDawg
Blue Technik LLC
Virtuoso Robotics Engineering
www.bluetechnik.com

RE: How can this part be manufactured?

true. having it watertight would be possible by several means, but furnace brazing would be my first choice.

RE: How can this part be manufactured?

For cost considerations, you could even consider a hydro-formed shell with a brazed cover and fittings. The one piece requirement increases the difficulty and processing time, and therefore the cost, by enormous proportions.

It is better to have enough ideas for some of them to be wrong, than to be always right by having no ideas at all.

RE: How can this part be manufactured?

kingnero,

Furnace brazing was my first thought as well. If the volume (quantity) is high enough, the complex piece could be cast economically and a plate used for the closure. If the volume is low, machining becomes a valid option, but precision machining of copper is not very fun.

RE: How can this part be manufactured?

Just thinking outside the box here, but is there any way you can make a material substitution to brass?

If so it could open up options in the 3D printing world: Link

If not, ignore this post...

RE: How can this part be manufactured?

Are the tolerances of the internal structures critical? Can it be a cast surface?
The different processes mentioned above will work.
Also, with recent improvements with the sintering process such as SLS, that can give you a good part.

Chris, CSWA
SolidWorks 13
ctopher's home
SolidWorks Legion

RE: How can this part be manufactured?

Machining one piece with the flow channels, and then furnace brazing on a flat plate would be my choice

RE: How can this part be manufactured?

I agree with compositepro. Have you considered 3D sand moulding . It is commercially available ,and then you could pour molten copper,traditional way. Decoring or removing sand from internal cavities should not be a problem.

RE: How can this part be manufactured?

(OP)
Thanks for all the responses.

So to make it out of a single part - casting maybe achieved with some difficultly. SLS rapid prototyping would also probably work however expensive? (I'm pretty sure you cad print / sinter copper)

Options if it is split into 2 parts - Furnace brazing or diffusion bonding.

I'm not against making it in 2 parts if its a lot more cost effected then a single part and can still be water tight.

So from everyone's suggestions above could I assume the most cost method would be to cast or machine the part in two halves and furnace braze them together? This part may end up mass manufactured.

Cheers,
Roy.

RE: How can this part be manufactured?

Actually, a more common way to make the type of heat exchanger you are making, is to furnace braze a coil of copper tubing to the back of a flat plate. The tubing has no seams to leak. It's not as pretty but is much less costly.

RE: How can this part be manufactured?

The geometry is not ideal for the process, but I think you can electroform a copper part like that on a sacrificial aluminum armature.

In particular, you'd have to deposit a _lot_ of copper, and mill off most of it to get the external prismatical shape.


Servometer is one supplier of electroformed parts.



Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: How can this part be manufactured?

Along with Mike's idea, there were some crazy suggestions we had (over beers, after work in the rocket factory) along the lines of: plating copper onto a coiled/looped piece of indium or Wood's metal wire, then melting out the indium. It would take a long time to build the flat shape via a plating/deposition process, but it could work. Other suggestions along the lines of plasma spray deposition over a suitable plastic or sintered carbon shape, or (in some shapes) packing and sintering a powdered metal over such shapes, with the carbon/plastic later "burned" out in a hot hydrogen furnace. Finally, there are some production parts made by casting aluminum or zinc alloys over stainless tubing; it might be possible to do similar tricks with copper, if you can find a ductile tube with a high enough melting point. All of these additive methods may have "issues" with the porosity inherent in the additive process, whether casting, electrodeposition, or plasma/flame/CV deposition. Bi-metal methods may have "issues" with differential thermal expansion and subsequent fatigue due to thermal cycling, especially where the bond between the metals is a brittle "intermetallic" phase. Fun to think about though.

RE: How can this part be manufactured?

Your next problem is that the process tradeoffs balance differently at different levels of production, and with particular details or artifacts that you may or may not feel are important to the gozinta.

E.g., at high volumes, you could coin/coldpress/impactextrude the halves, at a rate of many per minute, with some limits on depth, but you might have to accept some degree of mismatch after the brazing or diffusion bonding operation. At low volumes, you could CNC machine the halves, but copper is not fun to machine.

At most volumes, brass would be superior to copper for workability/chip_friability/scrap_value, at a very slight deficit in thermal conductivity.

To be frank about it, I regard insistence on pure copper, as opposed to another of the infinity of coppermetals (see copper.org), as an 'amateur track'.


Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: How can this part be manufactured?

To me, if this does not have a cover over it, it seems like an ideal application for a robotic router, depending on the thickness of the copper that has to remain.

If it has a cover, then I yield to what the experts have already said here...

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering

RE: How can this part be manufactured?

Man I hate it when I miss the details... nosmiley

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering

RE: How can this part be manufactured?

Yes, KENAT, it is a heat transfer problem.

{
I'm under the impression that the project, and the material selection, is being steered by some pushy, arrogant, dumbass MBA type, who looked no farther than a table of thermal conductivity numbers. ... as has happened to me on occasion. ... not that I'm bitter about it.
}

If you trouble yourself to run the numbers for the whole problem, you will find that the contribution to the total thermal gradient of a thin metallic barrier is completely dwarfed by the contribution of the boundary layer or laminar sublayer on the fluid side, and by the thermal resistance of the joint between the cooling module and whatever is being cooled on the hot side.

Whether the thin metallic barrier is copper, or brass, or nickel, or aluminum, or even steel, hardly matters in the real world, and is small enough to be difficult to measure if you wish to bother with a proper experiment.

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: How can this part be manufactured?

(OP)
Fortunately no pushy MBA types are driving this project only me who is doing this as a side line project at home. I am mechanical design engineer who designs automated production lines by trade with very little experience in thermodynamics but the more I work through the calculations the more I realize the material choice is minor compared with how the fluid actually conducts within itself and onto the exchange face. That must be why so many heat exchanges are made out of stainless steel rather than aluminium and copper.

Would this part be any easier to produce if it was made out of stainless steel, aluminium, bronze or brass?

Cheers for the input!!
Roy.

RE: How can this part be manufactured?

The part would be easier to produce if you go back to functional requirements and redesign it to be a different shape.

If this is immersed in another fluid, turn the bends 90 degrees. Piece of tube running the length, bend 180 and run the full length back, bend 180 and run the full length forward again. If needed, crimp end plates on to hold the tubes in shape and allow you to attach the gizmo to something else. If the other fluid that it is immersed in is air, you are going to need fins.

Google ... "images" ... "power steering cooler". Something like that.

RE: How can this part be manufactured?

One piece with no seams is a bitch in any material but less so in copper or nickel. Hugely expensive regardless.

If you allow a seam the cost is in machining the channels, so brass would be least awful.

Most producible is probably a serpentine copper tube cast into a block of aluminum.

Corrosion resistance will affect the selection.

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: How can this part be manufactured?

Make an outer case out of copper sheet, stainless sheet, aluminum sheet or whatever.

Make a serpentine pipe out of copper tube.

Put pipe inside case.

Pack space full of magnesium oxide powder.

RE: How can this part be manufactured?

It would be helpful to know at which exterior surface the heat exchange occurs. To maximize heat transfer efficiency, the wall thickness in this area should be kept as thin and uniform as practical. For example, if the heat exchange occurs at the flat top surface shown in the sketch, then a good construction approach would be machining or casting the lower section and closing out the top with a very thin sheet metal plate furnace brazed or diffusion bonded in place.

Brazing is a well established and reliable method of constructing heat exchangers. Diffusion bonding would be more expensive, but a diffusion bonded component is generally considered to be equal to one produced from a single piece of wrought material in terms of reliability.

Hope that helps.
Terry

RE: How can this part be manufactured?

sampsonr: It's not the material that's the problem, it's the design. Change the design to something that can be achieved using simple manufacturing techniques and your problem goes away.

It is a capital mistake to theorise before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts. (Sherlock Holmes - A Scandal in Bohemia.)

RE: How can this part be manufactured?

We need to start using Mickey Numbers...

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: How can this part be manufactured?

That's "Mikey" numbers. At least I hope we are not mice... shocked

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources