×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Seismic and Additions to Existing Buildings

Seismic and Additions to Existing Buildings

Seismic and Additions to Existing Buildings

(OP)
So if you are connecting an addition to an existing building what is the conscensus on the use of the Response Modification Factor and the system Overstrength Factor? By that I mean if the existing, older building, has different factors than the new addition what Factors would you use for the building as a whole, existing and addition as one building? It is the intent to not seismically separate the two.
Thanks

RE: Seismic and Additions to Existing Buildings

Every time I do an addition I do my best to make them two separate structures. My view is that it is easier to design the structure as two separate structures and not spend the time investigating the existing structures.

The answers to your questions can be found in either IBC chapter 34 or the IEBC. This part of the code places limits on how much you can increase the "demand/capacity ratio" of members before you need to update the member/structure to comply with the existing building code.

RE: Seismic and Additions to Existing Buildings

Which code are you using?

ASCE 7-10 section 12.2.3.3 says you have to use the least value of R in any given direction. There is an exception for small structures with flexible diaphragms that you can design each line of resistance with its own R factor, but the diaphragm always must use the lower R.

As far as the Overstrength, use whichever goes with the R factor you are using. Since the diaphragm is always using the lower R, us the Ω that goes with it.

RE: Seismic and Additions to Existing Buildings

I think your question is a little off base. You need to first look at your administrative code and determine what they will allow in terms of added mass to your existing structural system without triggering a code upgrade of the entire structure. Often around 5% to 10%. No more than 5% of total change in original mass.. and not a single element increased by 10% i believe is what the California Code says (CBC).

Once that is triggered, your question about R value goes away as it would now need to meet current code and the R value listed, for the whole thing.

This is why often many additions are added with a separation, especially if the existing structure has a rigid diaphragm, since adding elements could change the entire lateral distribution.. not just at your area of work.



Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources