×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Sizing Needle-type control valves in laminar and transitional flow

Sizing Needle-type control valves in laminar and transitional flow

Sizing Needle-type control valves in laminar and transitional flow

(OP)
In case this topic interests you, here's a reference to an excellent paper on the subject. Regrettably it's in AIChE's Chemical Engineering Progress, so it's not public content- but if you use needle-type globe valves as control valves or manual flow regulation valves for liquids, you'll want a copy of this paper for sure. Most places which use a lot of these, particularly Badger Research Control Valves or Fisher Baumann 51000s or similar valves, have a drawer or box full of expensive replacement trimsets from valves which were mis-sized on the assumption that flow in the trim was turbulent, or because they used the garbage viscosity correction factors published by some vendors or relied on the vendor's sizing entirely. In our experience, even the most reputable vendors get this wrong, sometimes by a factor of ten in Cv or more.

http://www.aiche.org/resources/publications/cep/20...

RE: Sizing Needle-type control valves in laminar and transitional flow

(OP)
To summarize, in case you don't have the AIChE membership:

Cv, required, = Q*sqrt(s.g/dP)*sqrt(1+(mu*av^2)/(Q*s.g.))

where Q = liquid flow, USGPM
mu = viscosity, centipoise
s.g. = specific gravity of liquid relative to water
av = laminar flow sizing factor
= 0.14 for a circular cross-section needle in a circular seat (Badger Research Control Valve, Swagelok fine metering valves, Samson, Jordan LoFlow etc.)- most valves which are "seat guided" meaning that the stem never completely leaves the seat
= 0.065 for a circular trim with triangular vee notches (Fisher Baumann 51000 etc.)

The paper also has an explicit solution for Q.

As mu*av^2/Q*s.g. approaches zero, the equation becomes the ordinary turbulent flow sizing equation.

Fits the data very well, according to the paper, fitting smoothly between laminar, transitional and turbulent flow.

Interesting to note that once flow slips into laminar, a "linear" trim takes on a characteristic more like an equal percentage valve. An equal percentage valve will waste more than 50% of its travel at the bottom end.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources