×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Galvanic Corrosion in Cooling Circuit - Does This Logic Make Sense?

Galvanic Corrosion in Cooling Circuit - Does This Logic Make Sense?

Galvanic Corrosion in Cooling Circuit - Does This Logic Make Sense?

(OP)
Im designing a system that has copper mirrors mounted within an aluminum housing. The copper mirrors will require water cooling, and the water is delivered through jackets in the aluminum housing.

From a heat transfer perspective, it would be ideal if the water came in contact with the backside faces of the copper mirrors. My concern in this scenario is from the corrosion perspective, now the copper and aluminum are both part of the same cooling circuit.

I recently had a discussion with another engineer about this concern and was given the suggestion of using a third material - a stainless steel piece - that will live in the space between the copper mirror and the aluminum housing. The coolant will come in contact with all 3 materials. In this case, the copper is no longer in physical contact with the aluminum, but they are both still in contact with the same coolant, as is the stainless steel.

The question that I am asking for now is - Does adding the stainless steel mount plate to the system as a layer between the copper and aluminum help the corrosion problem at all?

The only electro-potential in this system is the inherent potential in the materials, this is not an electrical system. As for the coolant, it is TBD and is yet to be specified.
Thanks for any insights.
Jeff

RE: Galvanic Corrosion in Cooling Circuit - Does This Logic Make Sense?

The stainless steel will not really help. It will increase the distance between the two and increase circuit resistance, which will have minor effects.
Plate the backside of the copper, that is in contact with water, with aluminum.

RE: Galvanic Corrosion in Cooling Circuit - Does This Logic Make Sense?

If this was a piping system you could use a length of SS to separate the two other materials.
The idea of plating is a good one.
Be careful about what you use for a sealant. If this is getting very hot you will need a material that will withstand hot water. Must rubbers will not.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Plymouth Tube

RE: Galvanic Corrosion in Cooling Circuit - Does This Logic Make Sense?

A stainless steel intermediate piece will reduce the corrosion rate but not eliminate the corrosion.

If the coolant can be a coolant mixture with corrosion inhibitors as well as being closed loop and deoxygenated, rather than being "water", then the stainless piece isn't really needed.

RE: Galvanic Corrosion in Cooling Circuit - Does This Logic Make Sense?

There are good inhibitor packages available for mixed metallurgy systems (think automotive).
And excluding all air from the system is a major requirement.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Plymouth Tube

RE: Galvanic Corrosion in Cooling Circuit - Does This Logic Make Sense?

(OP)
Thanks all for the information.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources