×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Simulation of Thermal Expansion. [Please help...I am so frustrated]

Simulation of Thermal Expansion. [Please help...I am so frustrated]

Simulation of Thermal Expansion. [Please help...I am so frustrated]

(OP)
Hi everyone,


I am trying to simulate the thermal expansion of a cubic model under Global temperature load.


My question is how to constraint the model so that expansion can be seen on EVERY surfaces? For some reasons Wildfire 4.0 requires not a point, not an edge but at least one surface to be fixed in order to run the analysis.


I tried placing another model underneath and defined the interface between two models as "contact" with infinite friction enabled. However the result was totally incorrect even though expansion did appear on all surfaces.


Any advices would be greatly appreciated!!



Lawrence

RE: Simulation of Thermal Expansion. [Please help...I am so frustrated]

This is a common issue (actually a fact of life) with any FEA you choose to use. You need to make sure that the body is constrained correctly to eliminate rigid body motion (unconstrained translation or rotation) but allow it to expand freely in the required directions.

For your cube (or indeed any model!) you do this with 3 separate point constraints. Example in a 100mm cube: constrain the origin (0,0,0) of the cube in X,Y and Z TRANSLATIONS. Constrain the point (100,0,0) in Y, Z TRANSLATIONS. Constrain point (0,0,100) in Y TRANSLATION. That's all you need, there are 6 degrees of freedom constrained. The cube will expand as required/expected with a global T load.

RE: Simulation of Thermal Expansion. [Please help...I am so frustrated]

..or simply use symmetry conditions on 3 faces of a quarter cube model.

RE: Simulation of Thermal Expansion. [Please help...I am so frustrated]

Of course Corus is absolutely correct in this case, the use of symmetry makes the most sense! In other cases where you cannot exploit symmetry it is worthwhile to understand how to use the 3 point constraint technique (as I described.)

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources