×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

tendon as compression steel in calculating stress at tranfer for pretensioned beams

tendon as compression steel in calculating stress at tranfer for pretensioned beams

tendon as compression steel in calculating stress at tranfer for pretensioned beams

(OP)
Is it possible/correct to include prestressed tendon as compression steel near the compressive face of pretensioned beam when calculating concrete stress at transfer ? I am aware that the tendon in compression is usually ignored in this calc.

I came across a person who suggested that the flexural stiffness of pretensioned beams can be improved by including the prestressed tenson as compression steel in the section analysis to determine compressive stress at transfer. The reason provided is that since the prestressed tendon is bonded to the concrete, the tendon is capable of resisting compression (through reducing tension), and this is different to applying a compressive strain to a non pre-tensioned tendon which obviously has no stiffness.

RE: tendon as compression steel in calculating stress at tranfer for pretensioned beams

It will be equivalent to using transformed section properties (concrete + steel) instead of just concrete. All design codes allow this approach...

RE: tendon as compression steel in calculating stress at tranfer for pretensioned beams

(OP)
Thank you for your response, Yakpol. My question is about whether it is correct to model tendons in the compressive portion of a section as "compression steel" in the section analysis. Normally we ignore them.

RE: tendon as compression steel in calculating stress at tranfer for pretensioned beams

kww,
Are you talking about strands used for pre-tension or tendons used for post-tension?
In pre-tension case use transformed section properties and PS jacking force to calculate stresses at transfer. That's a proper way to account for steel in compression or tensile zones. Alternatively you can use only concrete section properties and calculate prestress losses due to elastic shortening. The results will be identical.
In post-tensioning case during transfer consider duct holes and don't include tendons since they are not bonded yet.
Textbook may describe it better.
Regards,

RE: tendon as compression steel in calculating stress at tranfer for pretensioned beams

If the prestressing steel is bonded to the concrete, its stress will reduce when the concrete is in compression, just as it increases when it is in tension. So it should be included. Not including it can give un-conservative results as it may reduce the section capacity due to its position relative to the neutral axis!

Just make sure near the ends of the tendons (last 2-3m) that you consider the reduction in effectiveness of the bond due to the development length of the strand.

RE: tendon as compression steel in calculating stress at tranfer for pretensioned beams

(OP)
Thank you Rapt for the discussion. I agree that when calculating section capacities, both steels (reinforcing and prestressed) should be included. I am interested specifically in the calculation of stresses at transfer. Assuming all the tendons are close to the bottom of a simply supported pre-tensioned beam, ignoring these tendons when calculating the elastic stresses at transfer is conservative as these stresses will be smaller if they are calculated including the tendons as "compression steel" (since the section is stiffer in bending).

Whether to include the tendon as "compression steel" will likely have to be based on how a pretensioned beam behaves at transfer.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources