×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Weak Shell to Roof Joint NFPA 30 Tank Subdivisions
2

Weak Shell to Roof Joint NFPA 30 Tank Subdivisions

Weak Shell to Roof Joint NFPA 30 Tank Subdivisions

(OP)
Our team is designing a tank farm and we need guidance in interpreting a particular statement of NFPA 30 on tank farm subdivisions . Note that our tanks are NOT designed to be frangible tanks, as defined by API 650. However, they are atmospheric tanks with vertical cone roofs and in consideration of its overall construction, the seam between the roof and the shell is the weakest connection in the tank having a single weld overlay vs. the rest of the body and bottom of the tank having a double weld overlay. I quote the following entry of NFPA 30, sec 22.11.2.6.3.1 , which is the subject of my query:

"Where stable liquids of vertical roof cone tanks of weak roof-to-shell seam design or in floating roof tanks, one subdivision ...."

I seek guidance if the said statement is to be interpreted as describing a frangible tank as a general understanding in the Tank design linggo. I am of the opinion that the statement describes a frangible tank, and as such, our tanks are NOT falling into this categorization of NFPA, as they were not designed as frangible tanks according to API requirements. However, other members of my team are of the opinion that it is not necessary for the said statement to equate to a frangible tank as long as the construction of the tank is of vertical roof cone and with a weak roof-to-shell seam and thus qualifies for this category.

RE: Weak Shell to Roof Joint NFPA 30 Tank Subdivisions

See 22.7.1.2 in NFPA 30 for the approved designs for emergency venting purposes. Then, contact the Fire Marshal or inspector to determine if they are in agreement with you regarding the definition.

If the inspector and/or Fire Marshal will not permit emergency pressure relief devices per API 2000 in lieu of a frangible roof joint per API 650, consider using a lifter roof.

RE: Weak Shell to Roof Joint NFPA 30 Tank Subdivisions

I interpret the "week roof to shell seam design" to mean a frangible roof. I don't think you could automatically deduce that the roof seam was weaker than the corner weld based on number of weld layers; it's a different geometry, sees different pressures, etc.

RE: Weak Shell to Roof Joint NFPA 30 Tank Subdivisions

If your proposed tanks are not anchored to their pads, the square Shell-to-Floor 'chime' weld will be the weakest joint. Only way, other than anchorage, to avoid this is to follow the Frangible Roof details in 650. And I agree with you, NFPA's "weak roof-to-shell seam design" equates to API's Frangible Roof.

Tanks are tanks. Either design the tank to allow the roof to reliably blow off, or provide an Emergency Vent big enough to handle the infamous Pool Fire. Up to 50-ft diameter, a weighted room manway vent like ProtectoSeal's 53300 at 20-inch diameter will work. Above 50-ft, Frangible Roofs can be built.

and there is no Easter Bunny, nor a tank smaller that 30-ft with a frangible roof

RE: Weak Shell to Roof Joint NFPA 30 Tank Subdivisions

Kudos and a star to you, Duwe6 ! for insightful and practical knowledge !

The frangible roof question has been around for decades.

In 2005, API published some guidance:

API 937-A Study to Establish Relations for the Relative Strength of API 650 Cone Roof Roof-to-Shell and Shell-to-Bottom Joints

For historical insights, this is a good read and it supports Duwe6's recommendations :

http://www.thunderheadeng.com/wp-content/uploads/d...

Other information here:

https://www.nistm.org/houstonSept2009/docs/2009_Ho...


MJCronin
Sr. Process Engineer
Venture Engineering & Construction
www.VentureEngr.com

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources