×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

LRFD Strength Load Case vs Service Load Case

LRFD Strength Load Case vs Service Load Case

LRFD Strength Load Case vs Service Load Case

(OP)
Here is a conundrum. In doing an analysis on a reinforced concrete frame type (multi-column) pier, we are using AAASHTO LRFD code and looking at the strength and service load cases. In so doing, we are finding the service load case is producing larger demand as compared to the strength load cases. The reason for this is because we are calculating the forces due to internal thermal and shrinkage based on the stiffness of the frame (by means of the structural analysis program). In the strength load case, the load factor is 0.5 and in the service load case it is 1.0, so you can see the resulting forces from this will be higher with the service load case.

So, again, in summary, the service load case is higher than the strength load case. Based on this approach, the service load case will control over strength, which seems odd to this old guy that started with the Standard Specification way back when. How have you guys been handling this?

Designing the columns for this service load case will even be more interesting due to the interaction of axial plus bending. How has this been handled for service load cases?

Thank you.

RE: LRFD Strength Load Case vs Service Load Case

I have found that the shrinkage force that the Code specifies gets quite large. It also is not always conservative to assume a large force. I have not seen evidence of such large forces in most concrete bridges here in Canada. The Canadian Code has picked up on this where differential shrinkage is concerned and a reference in this section suggests using the tensile Modulus of Elasticity instead of the compressive.

HTH

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources