×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Once Again, Texas

Once Again, Texas

RE: Once Again, Texas

"cracks 3/4" wide......."

Cracks that wide would be due to settlement or some other unanticipated movement of the structure no?

RE: Once Again, Texas

60 million dollar HS stadium?? That would buy alot of text books, tutors, teachers. *face palm*

RE: Once Again, Texas

Well it looks like even the lower bowl sections were elevated - as opposed to slab-on-grade.

So if there were cracks on the mid-plaza area per the photo I attached then that would suggest a structural design issue vs. soil movement (Texas has expansive clays).

RE: Once Again, Texas

At least its all cracked up to be what they wanted!

RE: Once Again, Texas

What is amazing is that HIGH SCHOOL stadium is about the same size as some mid-major football stadiums.



RE: Once Again, Texas

Here is the description from the architect's website. It appears as if the concourse is elevated above grade.... but if the field is 15' below grade then where did the fill go? Depending on where the picture was taken an what happened to the cut material a portion of the concourse may be on fill? I will be interesting.

http://www.pbk.com/?id=308&ft=Stadiums&gid...

I agree with the price tag.... but I don't live in TX so I'm probably not meant to get it.

RE: Once Again, Texas

@ ZTENGGUY:

Probably financed by a gift from some Texan oil tycoon

RE: Once Again, Texas

They forgot to put out the soaker hoses...

“Know the rules well, so you can break them effectively.”
-Dalai Lama XIV

RE: Once Again, Texas

No specific knowledge, but suspect that the slab ("on ground") system is actually on carton form. Our soils here are expansive on the order of 6-9" PVR, but the true potential swell is more like unlimited. We are in the midst of a decade-long drought so odd things do happen when moisture moves in and out of deep soils, trees are removed, or buildings are built. I expect significantly more problems when the rains finally arrive.

RE: Once Again, Texas

Was that 60 with 6 zeros after it?? I think I just threw up a little bit in my mouth. Are there any $60M high school science and engineering facilities? I really believed I was beyond being shocked by anything these days.

RE: Once Again, Texas

Interesting story.

RE: Once Again, Texas

70%+ overstress in some isolated instances. That's a lot of overstress. I wonder what led to there being such deficiencies. Almost seems like loading might have been off on the structure. Maybe someone selected the wrong live load and it just snowballed from there.

RE: Once Again, Texas

Here's the crack plan that they posted. It shows numerous areas where cracks are greater than 2"!
The photos I saw don't show cracks that wide.

The article mentions stirrups spaced too far apart. It will be interesting to read the report as I'm always curious about how engineers can get things wrong (lessons learned!).

RE: Once Again, Texas

They certainly have all the ingredients for an epic legal battle.

The reported design overstress/overload of 10 or 20 percent is not be enough to cause that kind of cracking under self weight I think. Something else is seriously wrong with the materials or the construction. I take the "isolated" 70% overstress with a grain of salt at this point since the cracking is so widespread. FEA analysis can give wildly unrealistic "isolated" min/max results if that is what they are using.

I wonder how they made that crack map. Maybe a total station and an EI or two?



RE: Once Again, Texas

"The firm identified areas in the stadium where the load demand on the structure exceeded accepted building standards by 10 to 20 percent. In isolated locations, that number was greater than 70 percent, according to the firm’s analysis."

You may be seeing something different than that quote, but that is a very vague quote that could be interpreted a number of ways.

RE: Once Again, Texas

(OP)
In the newspaper, they said the stirrups exceeded the maximum spacing by one inch. I know in a court of law, this sounds bad, but one inch? Admittedly, I'm sure the newpaper article was not written from a technical view, but I'm hoping that nothing in the code has that fine of tolerance on it.
I've mistakenly used the beam depth divided by 2 for maximum stirrup spacing, when it's supposed to be "d" divided by 2. I hope nothing will fall down because of it!

RE: Once Again, Texas

1" is pretty nitpicky. I am sure the owner paid a geotechnical firm to due important special inspection on the structure which means the rebar probably isn't even close to the drawings anyway.

RE: Once Again, Texas

The crack pattern is interesting, either they were not allowed into office/closed areas, or those areas are not part of the suspended slab. Also interesting to see two areas that you would expect the same framing (because they are mirror images of each other) have completely different amounts of cracking. I would think this is were QC comes into play onsite?

RE: Once Again, Texas

Can anyone with more concrete experience figure out what structural system was used based upon the cracking pattern?

RE: Once Again, Texas

(OP)
If you look at the little embedded video in the news article, there's about a 5 second shot at the 43 second marker of the bottom of the slabs. They look like traditional beam and slab construction. The slabs look very thin from the way the cracks transmitted through to the bottom. The beams are also thin, four to six inches wide, kind of a joist member. The beams look OK (no cracking), at least in the small sample I could see.

RE: Once Again, Texas

I don't guess any of the reports have been made public?

RE: Once Again, Texas

I am curious as to how live loads are applied to a structure as large as this. Perhaps there is some engineering judgement in applying live load reductions or live load patterns that might be interpreted differently by a third party peer review.

RE: Once Again, Texas

Here's the underside photo that JedClampett was referring to.
Looks like a typical cast-in-place concrete skip-pan joist system. The multitude of cracks on the bottom of the slab don't imply a structural issue - this looks like shrinkage cracks or some kind of material failure.


RE: Once Again, Texas

I think the stadium was overloaded by Saturday Night Lights.

The game of horseshoes is big in TX, so you'd think they wouldknow how to design and build a horseshoe shaped stadium! How hard is that?

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering

RE: Once Again, Texas

Were the skip joists used under the concourse or is this a picture of the underside of the roof?
Skip joists are generally used for roofs not floors, especially floors that would require a 100 psf live load.

RE: Once Again, Texas

Are those actual crack widths or is someone using the wrong units? 3/4" width, 2" width...those aren't cracks they are gaping holes. With those you could fit rebar inside of the crack and not touch the concrete.

I agree that such widespread cracks don't look as much structural as they do a general material failure. If the slabs were under-reinforced, they are still one-way slabs and the cracks would show that. They are all criss-crossing, so maybe shrinkage or just poor curing? It gets hot in Texas, maybe they didn't keep it wet/cool enough?

Definitely keep us posted on any findings that come in!

RE: Once Again, Texas

Here's an article that shows that same crack plan, only on the the image here, it's cracks 0.02" and wider and cracks 0.02" and smaller. That makes a lot more sense. I would think if there were a bunch of 2" cracks, that's what you'd be seeing photos of.
http://www.businessinsider.com/high-school-footbal...

RE: Once Again, Texas

Surprised it is only going to cost 1 mil. to fix.

RE: Once Again, Texas

Skip joists are used all the time on floors. I've done many SF using that system...even at 100 psf assembly LL.

RE: Once Again, Texas

If you click on the Dallas News article Jed Clampett references above, it now has a Crack Plan showing 0.02" rather than 2" crack width.

RE: Once Again, Texas

You're right - they changed it from the one I posted above.

But some of those cracks looked much larger than 0.02". Some appeared to be close to 3/8".

RE: Once Again, Texas

Well, they categorize it as "larger than 0.02" and "smaller than 0.02", maybe from checking with a feeler gauge.

RE: Once Again, Texas

Wide module pan joists are the most common construction method in Dallas for floors at all loads. The arguments I have seen on this are entirely about getting someone to pay, not the relative merits of the problems. Obviously something went wrong, and the map cracking visible on the slab looks a lot like construction defect. There may be blame enough to go around, but I have not seen any real information to support design defect yet.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources